William P Meehan1, Jimmy Zhang, Rebekah Mannix, Michael J Whalen. 1. Sports Concussion Clinic, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Brain Injury Center, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. concussion.sportsmed@childrens.harvard.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although previous evidence suggests that the cognitive effects of concussions are cumulative, the effect of time interval between repeat concussions is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of time interval between repeat concussions on the cognitive function of mice. METHODS: We used a weight-drop model of concussion to subject anesthetized mice to 1, 3, 5, or 10 concussions, each a day apart. Additional mice were subjected to 5 concussions at varying time intervals: daily, weekly, and monthly. Morris water maze performance was measured 24 hours, 1 month, and 1 year after final injury. RESULTS: After 1 concussion, injured and sham-injured mice performed similarly in the Morris water maze. As the number of concussions increased, injured mice performed worse than sham-injured mice. Mice sustaining 5 concussions either 1 day or 1 week apart performed worse than sham-injured mice. When 5 concussions were delivered at 1-month time intervals, no difference in Morris water maze performance was observed between injured and sham-injured mice. After a 1-month recovery period, mice that sustained 5 concussions at daily and weekly time intervals continued to perform worse than sham-injured mice. One year after the final injury, mice sustaining 5 concussions at a daily time interval still performed worse than sham-injured mice. CONCLUSION: When delivered within a period of vulnerability, the cognitive effects of multiple concussions are cumulative, persistent, and may be permanent. Increasing the time interval between concussions attenuates the effects on cognition. When multiple concussions are sustained by mice daily, the effects on cognition are long term.
BACKGROUND: Although previous evidence suggests that the cognitive effects of concussions are cumulative, the effect of time interval between repeat concussions is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of time interval between repeat concussions on the cognitive function of mice. METHODS: We used a weight-drop model of concussion to subject anesthetized mice to 1, 3, 5, or 10 concussions, each a day apart. Additional mice were subjected to 5 concussions at varying time intervals: daily, weekly, and monthly. Morris water maze performance was measured 24 hours, 1 month, and 1 year after final injury. RESULTS: After 1 concussion, injured and sham-injured mice performed similarly in the Morris water maze. As the number of concussions increased, injured mice performed worse than sham-injured mice. Mice sustaining 5 concussions either 1 day or 1 week apart performed worse than sham-injured mice. When 5 concussions were delivered at 1-month time intervals, no difference in Morris water maze performance was observed between injured and sham-injured mice. After a 1-month recovery period, mice that sustained 5 concussions at daily and weekly time intervals continued to perform worse than sham-injured mice. One year after the final injury, mice sustaining 5 concussions at a daily time interval still performed worse than sham-injured mice. CONCLUSION: When delivered within a period of vulnerability, the cognitive effects of multiple concussions are cumulative, persistent, and may be permanent. Increasing the time interval between concussions attenuates the effects on cognition. When multiple concussions are sustained by mice daily, the effects on cognition are long term.
Authors: J P Kelly; J S Nichols; C M Filley; K O Lillehei; D Rubinstein; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters Journal: JAMA Date: 1991-11-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yoshitsugu Shitaka; Hien T Tran; Rachel E Bennett; Laura Sanchez; Marilyn A Levy; Krikor Dikranian; David L Brody Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: H L Laurer; F M Bareyre; V M Lee; J Q Trojanowski; L Longhi; R Hoover; K E Saatman; R Raghupathi; S Hoshino; M S Grady; T K McIntosh Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Erin M Buckley; Benjamin F Miller; Julianne M Golinski; Homa Sadeghian; Lauren M McAllister; Mark Vangel; Cenk Ayata; William P Meehan; Maria Angela Franceschini; Michael J Whalen Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Patricia B de la Tremblaye; Darik A O'Neil; Megan J LaPorte; Jeffrey P Cheng; Joshua A Beitchman; Theresa Currier Thomas; Corina O Bondi; Anthony E Kline Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos; David O Okonkwo; Jon Almquist; Julian Bailes; Mark Barisa; Jeffrey Bazarian; O Josh Bloom; David L Brody; Robert Cantu; Javier Cardenas; Jay Clugston; Randall Cohen; Ruben Echemendia; R J Elbin; Richard Ellenbogen; Janna Fonseca; Gerard Gioia; Kevin Guskiewicz; Robert Heyer; Gillian Hotz; Grant L Iverson; Barry Jordan; Geoffrey Manley; Joseph Maroon; Thomas McAllister; Michael McCrea; Anne Mucha; Elizabeth Pieroth; Kenneth Podell; Matthew Pombo; Teena Shetty; Allen Sills; Gary Solomon; Danny G Thomas; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Tony Yates; Ross Zafonte Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Ryan C Turner; Reyna L VanGilder; Zachary J Naser; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Julian E Bailes; Rae R Matsumoto; Jason D Huber; Charles L Rosen Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Shenandoah Robinson; Jacqueline B Berglass; Jesse L Denson; Justin Berkner; Christopher V Anstine; Jesse L Winer; Jessie R Maxwell; Jianhua Qiu; Yirong Yang; Laurel O Sillerud; William P Meehan; Rebekah Mannix; Lauren L Jantzie Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 4.164