Literature DB >> 17618438

Results of osteosynthesis with the ITST nail in fractures of the trochanteric region of the femur.

Antonio Herrera1, Javier Domingo, Angel Martinez.   

Abstract

A prospective study is presented of 551 hip fractures treated with the ITST (inter-trochanteric/sub-trochanteric) nail with a minimum mandatory follow-up of 1 year. Of the patients 73% were female, the rest male. The average age was 82.8 years. Fractures were classified according to the AO system, the most common sub-type recorded being the A2 (56%). Clinical and radiographic controls were performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The system allowed early mobilisation and walking in the majority of our patients, along with fracture consolidation in an acceptable time (12 weeks on average). There were technical complications during the operation in 10.5% of the cases, complications in the immediate postoperative period in 22.3% and late complications were detected in 5.1% of patients at 12 months. The ability to recover previous walking ability was 58%. The ITST nail emerges as a good system of osteosynthesis for fractures of the trochanteric region of the femur, allowing early weight-bearing, which favours bone consolidation. The surgical technique is not complex, the number of complications recorded is acceptable and the overall results obtained are comparable and even superior to those obtained with other osteosynthesis systems available for treatment of this type of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618438      PMCID: PMC2898960          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0411-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  The Gamma nail--a significant advance or a passing fashion?

Authors:  P T Calvert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

2.  Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective study in elderly patients.

Authors:  K S Leung; W S So; W Y Shen; P W Hui
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

3.  A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail.

Authors:  S F Rosenblum; J D Zuckerman; F J Kummer; B S Tam
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

4.  The Gamma nail for peritrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  S C Halder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

5.  [Comparison and presentation of technique and results of the gamma nail and dynamic hip screw].

Authors:  M Landolt
Journal:  Helv Chir Acta       Date:  1993-06

6.  Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman; M L Skovron; K J Koval; G Aharonoff; V H Frankel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomised trials.

Authors:  M J Parker; G A Pryor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The increasing incidence of fractures of the proximal femur: an orthopaedic epidemic.

Authors:  W A Wallace
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-06-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail.

Authors:  P J Radford; M Needoff; J K Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

10.  The future of hip fractures in the United States. Numbers, costs, and potential effects of postmenopausal estrogen.

Authors:  S R Cummings; S M Rubin; D Black
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  Which Fixation Device is Preferred for Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the United States? A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Authors:  Emily Niu; Arthur Yang; Alex H S Harris; Julius Bishop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Jirí Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartonícek; Radek Bartoska
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon.

Authors:  Jae-Seong Seo; Hak-Jin Min; Dong Min Kim; Seung-Min Oh; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Biomechanical Consequences of Nail Insertion Point and Anterior Cortical Perforation for Antegrade Femoral Nailing.

Authors:  Michael Ching; Aaron Gee; Christopher Del Balso; Abdel Lawendy; Emil H Schemitsch; Radovan Zdero; David Sanders
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Outcomes of early versus delayed weight-bearing with intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ameya Bhanushali; Joshua G Kovoor; Brandon Stretton; James T Kieu; Rebecca A Bright; Joseph N Hewitt; Christopher D Ovenden; Aashray K Gupta; Mohamed Z Afzal; Suzanne Edwards; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Christy Graff
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.374

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.