Literature DB >> 17617333

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

Kwok Kay Yau1, Wing Tai Siu, Chun Ngai Tang, George Pei Cheung Yang, Michael Ka Wah Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic appendectomy has been widely practiced for uncomplicated appendicitis; various reports demonstrated its merits in assisting diagnosis, reducing postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, and incidence of wound infection. The role of laparoscopy in management of complicated appendicitis, ie, gangrenous, perforated appendicitis and appendiceal abscess, remains undefined. Currently, the choice of operative approach is mostly at the surgeons' discretion. A retrospective study was conducted in our institution to review the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with complicated appendicitis. STUDY
DESIGN: From January 1999 to January 2004, records of patients older than 14 years of age with diagnosis of appendicitis were retrieved from computer database for analysis. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy to confirm diagnosis of complicated appendicitis, and patients subsequently underwent either laparoscopic or open appendectomies. Patients' demographics data and perioperative outcomes from the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1,133 patients with acute appendicitis underwent operations in our institution. Two hundred forty-four patients (21.5%) with complicated appendicitis were identified by laparoscopy, of which 175 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and 69 had open appendectomy (OA). Both groups of patients were comparable in demographics. Mean operative time was 55 minutes for LA group and 70 minutes for the OA group (p<0.001). Mean hospital stay was 5 days and 6 days for LA and OA group respectively (p<0.001). There was one conversion patient (0.6%) in the LA group who suffered from wound infection, and there were seven (10%) wound infections in the OA group (p=0.001). There were 10 cases (5.7%) of intraabdominal collection in the LA group and 3 (4.3%) in the OA group (p=0.473). There was no mortality in the current series.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is feasible and safe. It is associated with a significantly shorter operative time, lower incidence of wound infection, and reduced length of hospital stay when compared with patients who had open appendectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617333     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  35 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Markides; Daren Subar; Kallingal Riyad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  New strategy during complicated open appendectomy: convert open operation to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jin-Hui Zhu; Wei Li; Kai Yu; Jia Wu; Yun Ji; Jian-Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Chun-Chieh Yeh; Shih-Chi Wu; Chien-Chang Liao; Li-Ting Su; Chi-Hsun Hsieh; Tsai-Chung Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.

Authors:  Christos Athanasiou; Sonia Lockwood; Georgios A Markides
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Talha; Hany El-Haddad; Abd-Elhamid Ghazal; Gihan Shehata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoloop versus endostapler closure of the appendiceal stump in pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Arash Safavi; Monica Langer; Erik D Skarsgard
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  P Horvath; J Lange; R Bachmann; F Struller; A Königsrainer; M Zdichavsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port approach for acute appendicitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shafquat Zaman; Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed; Stephen Stonelake; Ananth Srinivasan; Abdul Karim Sillah; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve.

Authors:  Yap Yan Lin; Asim Shabbir; Jimmy B Y So
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.