Literature DB >> 17616770

Sugars and satiety: does the type of sweetener make a difference?

Pablo Monsivais1, Martine M Perrigue, Adam Drewnowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Widespread use of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) in beverages has been linked to rising obesity rates. One hypothesis is that HFCS in beverages has little satiating power.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the relative effect of commercial beverages containing sucrose or HFCS on hunger, satiety, and energy intakes at the next meal with the use of a within-subject design.
DESIGN: Thirty-seven volunteers (19 men, 18 women) aged 20-29 y consumed isocaloric cola beverages (215 kcal) sweetened with sucrose, HFCS 42, or HFCS 55. HFCS 42 contains 42% fructose, and HFCS 55 contains 55% fructose. Diet cola (2 kcal), 1%-fat milk (215 kcal), and no beverage were the control conditions. The 5 beverages were consumed at 1010 (2 h after a standard breakfast). Participants rated hunger, thirst, and satiety at baseline and at 20-min intervals after ingestion. A tray lunch (1708 kcal) was served at 1230, and energy intakes were measured. The free sugars content of sucrose-sweetened cola was assayed at the time of the study.
RESULTS: We found no differences between sucrose- and HFCS-sweetened colas in perceived sweetness, hunger and satiety profiles, or energy intakes at lunch. The 4 caloric beverages tended to partially suppress energy intakes at lunch, whereas the no-beverage and diet beverage conditions did not; the effect was significant (P<0.05) only for 1%-fat milk. Energy intakes in the diet cola and the no-beverage conditions did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSION: There was no evidence that commercial cola beverages sweetened with either sucrose or HFCS have significantly different effects on hunger, satiety, or short-term energy intakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17616770     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/86.1.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  11 in total

1.  Beverage Consumption Patterns of a Low-Income Population.

Authors:  Marie F Kuczmarski; Marc A Mason; Elizabeth A Schwenk; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman
Journal:  Top Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.508

2.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

3.  Rats' preferences for high fructose corn syrup vs. sucrose and sugar mixtures.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-01-12

Review 4.  Fructose toxicity: is the science ready for public health actions?

Authors:  Luc Tappy; Bettina Mittendorfer
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 5.  Is Sugar the new Tobacco? Insights from Laboratory Studies, Consumer Surveys and Public Health.

Authors:  Yann Le Bodo; Marie-Claude Paquette; Maggie Vallières; Natalie Alméras
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

6.  Changing perceptions of hunger on a high nutrient density diet.

Authors:  Joel Fuhrman; Barbara Sarter; Dale Glaser; Steve Acocella
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Comparison of free fructose and glucose to sucrose in the ability to cause fatty liver.

Authors:  Laura G Sánchez-Lozada; Wei Mu; Carlos Roncal; Yuri Y Sautin; Manal Abdelmalek; Sirirat Reungjui; MyPhuong Le; Takahiko Nakagawa; Hui Y Lan; Xuequing Yu; Richard J Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Higher Eating Frequency Does Not Decrease Appetite in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Martine M Perrigue; Adam Drewnowski; Ching-Yun Wang; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 9.  Factors that determine energy compensation: a systematic review of preload studies.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Luigi Palla; Kathryn Guest; Cassandra Ricchiuti; Neil Vint; Susan A Jebb; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.110

Review 10.  Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies.

Authors:  P J Rogers; P S Hogenkamp; C de Graaf; S Higgs; A Lluch; A R Ness; C Penfold; R Perry; P Putz; M R Yeomans; D J Mela
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.