Literature DB >> 1761658

Comparison of 'poor' responders with 'good' responders using a standard buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin regime for in-vitro fertilization.

J M Jenkins1, D W Davies, H Devonport, F W Anthony, S C Gadd, R H Watson, G M Masson.   

Abstract

This study identifies a group of 87 patients, who demonstrated a 'poor' response to a standard buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) regime. The subsequent outcome in 61 of these 'poor' responders when treated with a higher dose of HMG to achieve a satisfactory response was compared with 250 patients, who showed a 'good' response to the standard regime. 'Poor' responders were significantly older than 'good' responders (P less than 0.001), but no significant difference was demonstrated in the indication for in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Even on higher doses of HMG, 'poor' responders took longer for their follicles to achieve maturity than the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). 'Poor' responders produced 8.9 oocytes per oocyte collection compared to 11.8 in the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). The fertilization rate was significantly lower in the 'poor' responders compared to the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). Although there was no significant difference in morphometric grading between 'poor' responder embryos and 'good' responder embryos, the rate of cell division was significantly slower in embryos of the 'poor' responders than the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). The pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was 9% in the 'poor' responders compared to 29% in the 'good' responders (P less than 0.01). The implantation rate in the 'poor' responders was 4.4% compared to 16.1% in the 'good' responders (P less than 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1761658     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  27 in total

1.  Effect of micro-vibration culture system on embryo development.

Authors:  Yong Soo Hur; Jeong Hyun Park; Eun Kyung Ryu; Sung Jin Park; Jun Ho Lee; Soo Hee Lee; Jung Yoon; San Hyun Yoon; Chang Young Hur; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved?

Authors:  Martha Luna; Catherine Bigelow; Marlena Duke; Jane Ruman; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  In vitro fertilization with low-dose clomiphene citrate stimulation in women who respond poorly to superovulation.

Authors:  A O Awonuga; A Nabi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase in poor responder patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marzieh Aghahosseini; Ashraf Aleyassin; Sepideh Khodaverdi; Fatemeh Esfahani; Robabeh Mohammadbeigi; Shohreh Movahedi; Ali Kord Valeshabad; Atossa Mahdavi; Parvin Fallahi; Parisa Shabani; Zahra Rezaeeian; Maryam Khodaverdi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Rearrangement of extracellular matrix during cluster formation by human luteinising granulosa cells in culture.

Authors:  M C Richardson; C Slack; I J Stewart
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  In vitro fertilization outcome according to age and follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3.

Authors:  S Bassil; P A Godin; S Gillerot; J C Verougstraete; J Donnez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Modified natural cycle using GnRH antagonist can be an optional treatment in poor responders undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Shai E Elizur; Dilek Aslan; Adrian Shulman; Boaz Weisz; David Bider; Jehoshua Dor
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Urinary bisphenol A concentrations and ovarian response among women undergoing IVF.

Authors:  E Mok-Lin; S Ehrlich; P L Williams; J Petrozza; D L Wright; A M Calafat; X Ye; R Hauser
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2009-11-30

9.  Follicle stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 predict ovulation stimulation response.

Authors:  A Ebrahim; G Rienhardt; S Morris; T F Kruger; C J Lombard; J P Van der Merwe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.