PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist supplementation during natural cycles in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 540 cycles of 433 suitable patients who were divided by treatment protocol into modified natural, antagonist, and long agonist groups. There were 52 modified natural cycles with GnRH antagonist supplementation, 200 stimulated cycles with GnRH antagonist, and 288 long GnRH agonist cycles. Cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean number of oocytes retrieved in the modified natural group was significantly lower than in the stimulated antagonist and long agonist groups (1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.1 and 2.5 +/- 1.1, respectively, p < 0.05). The respective implantation and pregnancy rates were 10% and 14.3%, 6.75% and 10.2%, and 7.4% and 10.6%. Cycle outcome and cycle properties were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Modified natural IVF cycle with GnRH antagonist supplementation is a feasible alternative to ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders.
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist supplementation during natural cycles in poor responders undergoing IVF-ET treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 540 cycles of 433 suitable patients who were divided by treatment protocol into modified natural, antagonist, and long agonist groups. There were 52 modified natural cycles with GnRH antagonist supplementation, 200 stimulated cycles with GnRH antagonist, and 288 long GnRH agonist cycles. Cycle characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The mean number of oocytes retrieved in the modified natural group was significantly lower than in the stimulated antagonist and long agonist groups (1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.1 and 2.5 +/- 1.1, respectively, p < 0.05). The respective implantation and pregnancy rates were 10% and 14.3%, 6.75% and 10.2%, and 7.4% and 10.6%. Cycle outcome and cycle properties were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Modified natural IVF cycle with GnRH antagonist supplementation is a feasible alternative to ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders.
Authors: P G Crosignani; G Ragni; G C Lombroso; C Scarduelli; L de Lauretis; A Caccamo; L Dalprà; V Cavioni; C Cristiani; H Wyssling Journal: J Steroid Biochem Date: 1989-01 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Federica Di Guardo; Christophe Blockeel; Michel De Vos; Marco Palumbo; Nikolaos Christoforidis; Herman Tournaye; Panagiotis Drakopoulos Journal: Ther Adv Reprod Health Date: 2022-01-14