Literature DB >> 17616492

New pharmacist supply projections: lower separation rates and increased graduates boost supply estimates.

Katherine K Knapp1, James M Cultice.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To revise the 2000 Bureau of Health Professions Pharmacist Supply Model based on new data.
DESIGN: Stock-flow model.
SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A 2004 estimate of active pharmacists reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics was used to derive the base count for the 2007 supply model.
INTERVENTIONS: Starting with a 2004 base of active pharmacists, new graduates are added to the supply annually and losses resulting from death and retirement are subtracted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age- and gender-based pharmacist supply estimates, 2004-2020.
RESULTS: Increased U.S. pharmacist supply estimates (236,227 in 2007 to 304,986 in 2020) indicate that pharmacists will remain the third largest professional health group behind nurses and physicians. Increases were driven by longer persistence in the workforce (59%), increased numbers of U.S. graduates (35%), and increases from international pharmacy graduates (IPGs) achieving U.S. licensure (6%). Since more pharmacists are expected to be working part time the full-time equivalent (FTE) supply will be reduced by about 15%. The mean age of pharmacists was projected to decline from 47 to 43 by 2020. Because of unequal distribution across age groups, large pharmacist cohorts approaching retirement age will result in fewer pharmacists available to replace them. The ratio of pharmacists to the over-65 population is expected to decrease after 2011 and continue to fall beyond 2020; this is likely a reflection of baby boomers passing through older age cohorts.
CONCLUSION: The revised estimated active U.S. pharmacist head count in 2006 is 232,597, with equivalent FTEs totaling approximately 198,000. The substantial increase over the 2000 pharmacist supply model estimates is primarily attributable to pharmacists remaining in the workforce longer and educational expansion. U.S. licensed IPGs account for less than 6% of overall increases. The pharmacist work-force is projected to become younger on average by about 4 years by 2020. Coincident demands for more physicians and nurses over the same period and shortages in all three professions stipulate that active steps be taken, including continued monitoring of work trends among pharmacists and other health professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17616492     DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2007.07003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  12 in total

Review 1.  Educating for safety in the pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Eleanor M Vogt; Daniel C Robinson; Shelley L Chambers-Fox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Capacity of hospitals to partner with academia to meet experiential education requirements for pharmacy students.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Educational and career goals of pharmacy students upon graduation.

Authors:  Mattia M Migliore; Ryan C Costantino; Nicholas A Campagna; David S Albers
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Identifying work setting profile factors from the Career Pathway Evaluation Program.

Authors:  Jon C Schommer; Elliott M Sogol; Lawrence M Brown
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Report of the 2008-2009 Professional Affairs Committee: The academy's leadership agenda for meeting academic and practice workforce demands through postgraduate professional education.

Authors:  Caroline A Gaither; David D Allen; Douglas C Anderson; W Greg Leader; Laura A Morgan; Stanley S Weber; Jennifer S Williams; Arlene A Flynn
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Association between increased number of US pharmacy graduates and pharmacist counts by state from 2000-2009.

Authors:  Surrey M Walton; David A Mott; Katherine K Knapp; Gail Fisher
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Projected growth in pharmacy education and research, 2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Katherine K Knapp; Michael Manolakis; Andrew A Webster; Keith M Olsen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  Examining pharmacy workforce issues in the United States and the United kingdom.

Authors:  Jordan R Covvey; Peter P Cohron; Alexander B Mullen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 9.  Consideration of Aggressive and Strategic Approaches to Address Declining Enrollment in US Pharmacy Schools.

Authors:  Nina Pavuluri; Rajender R Aparasu; Kathleen M K Boje; Jennifer Danielson; Shareen Y El-Ibiary; Anand Krishnan V Iyer; Leslie A Ochs; Jennifer D Robinson; Samit Shah; Christopher C Williams; Timothy M Moore; Kurt A Wargo
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Assessing Unmet and Latent Demand for Pharmacists at the State Level.

Authors:  Prachi Arora; David A Mott; Michelle A Chui; David H Kreling
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.