Literature DB >> 17613087

Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory morbidity in children.

Nazan Cobanoglu1, Nural Kiper, Embiya Dilber, Nermin Gurcan, Ayhan Gocmen, Ugur Ozcelik, Deniz Dogru, Ebru Yalcin, Sevgi Pekcan, Mehmet Kose.   

Abstract

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) contains carcinogenic and toxic agents. Smoking might have a more serious effect on children than adults. We aimed to examine the effects of passive smoking on pulmonary function and respiratory health in children and to assess the concordance between parental self-reported smoking habits and urinary cotinine levels in their children. This cross-sectional study was conducted in the winter with the participation of 131 children (9-12 yr old). The procedure for each subject consisted of administration of a questionnaire to the parents, and collection of a urine sample and measurement of lung function in each child. Cotinine level excreted into urine was analyzed with respect to parental self-reported smoking behavior. Working mothers and mothers with higher level of education tended to smoke more at home (p values, respectively, .002 and .005). There was a statistical difference between the urinary cotinine levels of children when divided into two groups according to their fathers' smoking behavior at home (p = .0001). No statistically significant difference was determined in the mean episodes of respiratory infections treated during the last 12 mo among the groups formed according to daily number of cigarettes smoked by the parents at home (1: not exposed; 2: < 5 cigarettes; 3: 5-10 cigarettes; 4: > 10 cigarettes), or among the groups formed according to urinary cotinine levels (1: < 10 ng/ml; 2: > or =10 ng/ml). No significant difference was demonstrated in any of the respiratory function parameters investigated between the groups considered. The reliability of the declarations of the parents in the estimation of ETS exposure of children was low. Children are unable to remove themselves from ETS exposure. It is better to reduce the percentage of parents who smoke rather than to isolate smokers or increase ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17613087     DOI: 10.1080/08958370701402085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  5 in total

1.  Residential smoking restrictions are not associated with reduced child SHS exposure in a baseline sample of low-income, urban African Americans.

Authors:  Bradley N Collins; Jennifer K Ibrahim; Melbourne Hovell; Natalie M Tolley; Uma S Nair; Karen Jaffe; David Zanis; Janet Audrain-McGovern
Journal:  Health (Irvine Calif)       Date:  2010-11

2.  Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries.

Authors:  Heather Wipfli; Erika Avila-Tang; Ana Navas-Acien; Sungroul Kim; Georgiana Onicescu; Jie Yuan; Patrick Breysse; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Does raising awareness in families reduce environmental tobacco smoke exposure in wheezy children?

Authors:  Hikmet Tekin Nacaroglu; Demet Can; Ilker Gunay; Canan Sule Unsal Karkıner; Turkan Gunay; Dilek Cimrin; Tugba Nalcabasmaz
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Exposure to paternal tobacco smoking increased child hospitalization for lower respiratory infections but not for other diseases in Vietnam.

Authors:  Reiko Miyahara; Kensuke Takahashi; Nguyen Thi Hien Anh; Vu Dinh Thiem; Motoi Suzuki; Hiroshi Yoshino; Le Huu Tho; Hiroyuki Moriuchi; Sharon E Cox; Lay Myint Yoshida; Dang Duc Anh; Koya Ariyoshi; Michio Yasunami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke by healthy children aged below five (Preliminary study).

Authors:  Gözde İnci; Serpil Uğur Baysal; Ali Rıza Şişman
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.