Literature DB >> 17612376

[Relationship between nutritional intervention and quality of life in cancer patients].

M M Marín Caro1, A Laviano, C Pichard, C Gómez Candela.   

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is a concept assessing physical, psychological and social factors which are influencing the patients' well being. Cancer and its therapy induce severe metabolic changes associated with QOL impairment. These alterations contribute to an increased energy wasting and a decreased food intake. Besides, it may lead to tumoral cachexia due to the complex interactions between pro-inflammatory cytokines and the host metabolism. On the other hand, and beyond physical impairments and metabolic effects from cancer, patients often suffer from psychological stress, such as depression. A nutritional intervention should be implemented as soon as cancer is diagnosed. It should be appropriate to the individual needs of the patient, considering the type of oncologic treatment (whether it is curative or palliative), the clinical conditions and the nutritional status. The aim is to reduce or even revert nutritional status impairment, improve the general condition, and subsequently improve quality of life. The primary focus of nutritional intervention accompanying oncologic treatment intended to cure is on the optimization of the balance between energy waste and food intake. Thus trying to achieve further specific purposes such as a decrease of rate of complications and an amelioration of the response and tolerance to the oncologic therapy. The purpose of nutritional support in palliative care is controlling the symptoms related to food intake and delaying the loss of autonomy. And by this means maintaining or improving patients' QOL. It is corraborated by a literature review, that nutritional therapy should form part of the integral oncological support since it contributes considerably to a QOL improvement. Because of the possibility to identify the patients' needs and expectations by assessing their QOL it should be generally included into their nutritional evaluation to be able to tailor the adequate nutritional support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17612376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Hosp        ISSN: 0212-1611            Impact factor:   1.057


  3 in total

1.  Influence of nutritional status and frailty phenotype on health-related quality of life of patients with bladder or kidney cancer.

Authors:  Patrícia Fonseca Dos Reis; Patrícia Sousa de França; Mylena Pinto Dos Santos; Renata Brum Martucci
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Disease drivers of aging.

Authors:  Richard J Hodes; Felipe Sierra; Steven N Austad; Elissa Epel; Gretchen N Neigh; Kristine M Erlandson; Marissa J Schafer; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Christopher Wiley; Judith Campisi; Mary E Sehl; Rosario Scalia; Satoru Eguchi; Balakuntalam S Kasinath; Jeffrey B Halter; Harvey Jay Cohen; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Tim A Ahles; Nir Barzilai; Arti Hurria; Peter W Hunt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Body Composition and Biochemical Parameters of Nutritional Status: Correlation with Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Luz-Ma-Adriana Balderas-Peña; Faviola González-Barba; Brenda-Eugenia Martínez-Herrera; Ulises-Rodrigo Palomares-Chacón; Oscar Durán-Anguiano; Mario Salazar-Páramo; Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez; Carlos Dávalos-Cobián; Arnulfo-Hernán Nava-Zavala; Guillermo-Allan Hernández-Chávez; Daniel Sat-Muñoz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.