Literature DB >> 17611706

Mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are risk factors for new fractures.

C Roux1, J Fechtenbaum, S Kolta, K Briot, M Girard.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This prospective four-year study indicates that post-menopausal osteoporotic women with mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures have an increased risk of incident fractures.
INTRODUCTION: Mild vertebral fractures are under diagnosed as there is disagreement about their clinical significance. Our aim was to assess the risk of subsequent fractures induced by both prevalent and incident mild vertebral fractures in osteoporotic post-menopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three thousand three hundred and fifty-eight patients, aged 74 +/- 6 years, with post-menopausal osteoporosis included in the placebo groups of two clinical trials of strontium ranelate were followed for 4 years. A Cox regression model adjusted on age, body mass index and bone mineral density was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) of fracture in subjects with only mild fractures as compared to patients without fracture, and to patients with at least one grade >or= 2 fracture. These calculations were made for prevalent and then incident fractures.
RESULTS: The RR of vertebral fracture in 4 years was 1.8 (1.3-2.4) p < 0.001, and 2.7 (2.3-3.3) p < 0.001 for patients having only mild vertebral fractures and at least one grade >or= 2 fracture at baseline respectively. The RR of vertebral fracture in the 3rd and 4th years of follow-up was 1.7 (1.1-2.6) p = 0.01, and 1.9 (1.3-2.6) p < 0.001 for patients having during the first 2 years incident mild fractures only, and for patients having at least one grade >or= 2 incident fracture respectively. The RR of non-vertebral fracture in 4 years was 1.3 (0.9-1.9) p = 0.15 and 1.7 (1.4-2.1) p < 0.001 for patients having only mild or at least one grade >or= 2 vertebral fracture at baseline respectively. For patients aged more than 70 years, these RR were 1.45 (0.99-2.11) (p = 0.06), and 1.72 (1.36-2.18) p < 0.001 respectively. The RR of non-vertebral fracture in the 3rd and 4th years was 1.68 (1.36-2.09) p < 0.001 for patients having at least one grade >or= 2 incident fracture during the 2 first years of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Mild vertebral fractures are a risk factor for subsequent vertebral and non-vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis; 1 out of 4 patients with an incident mild vertebral fracture in 2 years will fracture again within the 2 next years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17611706     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0413-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L J Melton; D E Wenger; E J Atkinson; S J Achenbach; T H Berquist; B L Riggs; G Jiang; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; L Christensen; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Association of severe vertebral fractures with reduced quality of life: reduction in the incidence of severe vertebral fractures by teriparatide.

Authors:  G G Crans; S L Silverman; H K Genant; E V Glass; J H Krege
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-12

4.  Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; D E Thompson; J A Cauley; M C Nevitt; D M Kado; M C Hochberg; A C Santora; D M Black
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Identification of vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; J Adams; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture.

Authors:  R Lindsay; S L Silverman; C Cooper; D A Hanley; I Barton; S B Broy; A Licata; L Benhamou; P Geusens; K Flowers; H Stracke; E Seeman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  42 in total

1.  Vertebral fractures cascade: potential causes and risk factors.

Authors:  H Che; V Breuil; B Cortet; J Paccou; T Thomas; L Chapuis; F Debiais; N Mehsen-Cetre; R M Javier; S Loiseau Peres; C Roux; K Briot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The American Orthopaedic Association's Own the Bone® database: a national quality improvement project for the treatment of bone health in fragility fracture patients.

Authors:  B C Carlson; W A Robinson; N R Wanderman; A N Nassr; P M Huddleston; M J Yaszemski; B L Currier; K J Jeray; K L Kirk; A D Bunta; S Murphy; B Patel; C M Watkins; D L Sietsema; B J Edwards; L L Tosi; P A Anderson; B A Freedman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Obesity, bone density relative to body weight and prevalent vertebral fracture at age 62 years: the Newcastle thousand families study.

Authors:  H A Rudman; F Birrell; M S Pearce; S P Tuck; R M Francis; L Treadgold; K Hind
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Diagnosis of vertebral fractures using a low-dose biplanar imaging system.

Authors:  K Briot; J Fechtenbaum; A Etcheto; S Kolta; A Feydy; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Informed communication with study subjects of radiographically detected osteoporotic vertebral deformity.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Nazmi Che-Nordin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-09

6.  The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nicole C Wright; Anne C Looker; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth S Delzell; Susan Randall; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Use of DXA-based technology for detection and assessment of risk of vertebral fracture in rheumatology practice.

Authors:  Michael Maricic
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Number and severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures in Japanese women with osteoporosis: results from the minodronate trial.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Masataka Shiraki; Masao Fukunaga; Tetsuo Nakano; Kunio Takaoka; Yasuo Ohashi; Toshitaka Nakamura; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in Sweden: an analysis of 13,496 patients admitted to hospital.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Paul Blomqvist; Per Svedmark; Fredrik Granath; Erik Buskens; Martin Larsson; Johanna Adami
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Vertebral morphometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures assessment (VFA).

Authors:  D Diacinti; G Guglielmi; D Pisani; D Diacinti; R Argirò; C Serafini; E Romagnoli; S Minisola; C Catalano; V David
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.