Literature DB >> 17610436

The impacts of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on children who enroll: findings from ten states.

Genevieve Kenney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine the extent to which enrollment in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) affects access to care and service use in 10 states that account for over 60 percent of all SCHIP enrollees. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Surveys of 16,700 SCHIP enrollees were conducted in 2002 as part of a congressionally mandated study. Three domains of SCHIP enrollees were included: (1) children who were recently enrolled in SCHIP, (2) those who had been enrolled in SCHIP for 5 months or more, and (3) those who had recently disenrolled from SCHIP. Response rates varied across states and domains but were clustered between 75 and 80 percent. Five different types of indicators were examined: (1) service use; (2) unmet need; (3) parental perceptions about being able to meet their child's health care needs; (4) presence and type of a usual source of care; and (5) provider communication and accessibility. STUDY
DESIGN: The experiences SCHIP enrollees have while on the program are compared with those a separate sample of children had before enrolling using a separate sample pretest and posttest design, controlling for observable characteristics of the children and their families. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: The sample was drawn based on a list frame of SCHIP enrollees. The survey was administered in English and Spanish, by Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI). Field follow-up was used to locate families who could not be reached by telephone and these interviews were conducted by cellular telephone. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: SCHIP enrollment was found to improve access to care along a number of different dimensions, other things equal, particularly relative to being uninsured. Established SCHIP enrollees were more likely to receive office visits, preventive health and dental care, and specialty care, more likely to have a usual source for medical and dental care and to report better provider communication and accessibility, and less likely to have unmet needs, financial burdens, and parental worry associated with meeting their child's health care needs. The findings are robust with respect to alternative specifications and hold up for individual states and subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment in SCHIP appears to be improving children's access to primary health care services, which in turn is causing parents to have greater peace of mind about meeting their children's needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17610436      PMCID: PMC1955761          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00707.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  17 in total

1.  Covering the uninsured through TennCare: does it make a difference?

Authors:  L Moreno; S D Hoag
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Economic foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A M Garber; C E Phelps
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The impact of Medicaid on physician use by low-income children.

Authors:  M L Rosenbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Health insurance, the quantity and quality of prenatal care, and infant health.

Authors:  R Kaestner
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Impact of a children's health insurance program on newly enrolled children.

Authors:  J R Lave; C R Keane; C J Lin; E M Ricci; G Amersbach; C P LaVallee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Health insurance status and ambulatory care for children.

Authors:  J J Stoddard; R F St Peter; P W Newacheck
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  SCHIP's impact in three states: how do the most vulnerable children fare?

Authors:  Andrew W Dick; Cindy Brach; R Andrew Allison; Elizabeth Shenkman; Laura P Shone; Peter G Szilagyi; Jonathan D Klein; Eugene M Lewit
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The State Children's Health Insurance Program: successes, shortcomings, and challenges.

Authors:  Genevieve Kenney; Debbie I Chang
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Children's access to primary care: differences by race, income, and insurance status.

Authors:  P W Newacheck; D C Hughes; J J Stoddard
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Patient cost sharing: how much is too much?

Authors:  Sally Trude
Journal:  Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change       Date:  2003-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  The effect of the children's health insurance program on pediatricians' work hours.

Authors:  Fang He; Chapin White
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2013-04-03

2.  Trends in health insurance status of US children and their parents, 1998-2008.

Authors:  Heather Angier; Jennifer E DeVoe; Carrie Tillotson; Lorraine Wallace; Rachel Gold
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-11

3.  Transitions from private to public health coverage among children: estimating effects on out-of-pocket medical costs and health insurance premium costs.

Authors:  H Luke Shaefer; Colleen M Grogan; Harold A Pollack
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The association of health insurance and disease impairment with reported asthma prevalence in U.S. children.

Authors:  Tumaini R Coker; Robert M Kaplan; Paul J Chung
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Effects of enrollment in medicaid versus the state children's health insurance program on kindergarten children's untreated dental caries.

Authors:  Tegwyn H Brickhouse; R Gary Rozier; Gary D Slade
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Disparities, race/ethnicity and access to pediatric kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Sandra Amaral; Rachel Patzer
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Racial and ethnic differences in pediatric access to preemptive kidney transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  R E Patzer; B A Sayed; N Kutner; W M McClellan; S Amaral
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  An evaluation on the effect of the copayment waiver policy for Korean hospitalized children under the age of six.

Authors:  Sook Young Kwak; Seok-Jun Yoon; In-Hwan Oh; Young-Eun Kim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Access disparity and health inequality of the elderly: unmet needs and delayed healthcare.

Authors:  Tetsuji Yamada; Chia-Ching Chen; Chiyoe Murata; Hiroshi Hirai; Toshiyuki Ojima; Katsunori Kondo; Joseph R Harris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Medicaid and SCHIP coverage: findings from California and North Carolina.

Authors:  Genevieve Kenney; Jamie Rubenstein; Anna Sommers; Stephen Zuckerman; Fredric Blavin
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.