Literature DB >> 17610107

Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: CT vs. integrated FDG PET/CT.

Sang Soo Shin1, Yong Yeon Jeong, Jung Jun Min, Hyeong Rok Kim, Tae Woong Chung, Heoung Keun Kang.   

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging is essential in determining the optimal therapeutic planning for individual patients. The computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer, even if controversial, may be useful for planning surgery and/or neoadjuvant therapy, particularly when local tumor extension into adjacent organs or distant metastases are detected. There have been significant changes in the CT technology with the advent of multi-detector row CT (MDCT) scanner. Advances in CT technology have raised interest in the potential role of CT for detection and staging of colorectal cancer. In recent studies, MDCT with MPR images has shown promising accuracy in the evaluation of local extent and nodal involvement of colorectal cancer. Combined PET/CT images have significant advantages over either alone because it provides both functional and anatomical data. Therefore, it is natural to expect that PET/CT would improve the accuracy of preoperative staging of colorectal cancer. The most significant additional information provided by PET/CT relates to the accurate detection of distant metastases. For the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer, CT has relative advantages over PET/CT in regard to the depth of tumor invasion through the wall, extramural extension, and regional lymph node metastases. PET/CT should be performed on selected patients with suggestive but inconclusive metastatic lesions with CT. In addition, PET/CT with dedicated CT protocols, such as contrast-enhanced PET/CT and PET/CT colonography, may replace the diagnostic CT for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17610107     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-007-9262-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  12 in total

1.  Desmoid tumour (aggressive fibromatosis) of the colon mimics malignancy on dual time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  W Makis; A Ciarallo; G Abikhzer; J Stern; J Laufer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Reliability of (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the nodal staging of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Hee Jung Yi; Kyung Sook Hong; Nara Moon; Soon Sup Chung; Ryung-Ah Lee; Kwang Ho Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-12-31

Review 4.  Beyond Histologic Staging: Emerging Imaging Strategies in Colorectal Cancer with Special Focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Tyler J Fraum; Joseph W Owen; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

5.  Role of the standardized uptake value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in detecting the primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Shuichiro Uchiyama; Yukihiro Haruyama; Takashi Asada; Masayuki Hotokezaka; Shigeki Nagamachi; Kazuo Chijiiwa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric P van der Stok; Manon C W Spaander; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jae Young Kwak; Jae Seung Kim; Hye Jin Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Hybrid imaging is the future of molecular imaging.

Authors:  Rj Hicks; Ewf Lau; Ds Binns
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-07-01

9.  What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A meta-analysis : imaging for recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Monique Maas; Iris J G Rutten; Patty J Nelemans; Doenja M J Lambregts; Vincent C Cappendijk; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  GLUT1 gene is a potential hypoxic marker in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Fu-Yen Chung; Ming-Yii Huang; Ching-Sheng Yeh; Hui-Jen Chang; Tian-Lu Cheng; Li-Chen Yen; Jaw-Yuan Wang; Shiu-Ru Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.