PURPOSE: To assess the role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and multidetector-row CT (MD-CT) in detecting the primary lesion and lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancers. METHODS: A collective total of 80 lesions resected from 77 patients were examined pathologically. We analyzed the significance of the standardized uptake value (SUV) and its relationship with the clinicopathologic findings of primary lesions and lymph node metastasis. The detectability of primary lesions and lymph node metastases on PET-CT images was compared with that on MD-CT images. RESULTS: The detectability of primary lesions was better on PET-CT images than on MD-CT images (p = 0.0023). We observed no significant differences in the SUV with respect to staging, tumor grade, lymphatic or vessel invasion, and macroscopic type; however, primary tumor size analysis revealed that tumors larger than 3 cm had a higher SUV than those smaller than 3 cm. The sensitivity of PET-CT for detecting lymph node metastasis was lower than that of MD-CT, but the specificity of PET-CT was higher than that of MD-CT. CONCLUSIONS: The SUV of primary cancers tends to increase in proportion to tumor size. Although the value of PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastasis is limited, PET -positive lymph nodes can be considered metastatic.
PURPOSE: To assess the role of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and multidetector-row CT (MD-CT) in detecting the primary lesion and lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancers. METHODS: A collective total of 80 lesions resected from 77 patients were examined pathologically. We analyzed the significance of the standardized uptake value (SUV) and its relationship with the clinicopathologic findings of primary lesions and lymph node metastasis. The detectability of primary lesions and lymph node metastases on PET-CT images was compared with that on MD-CT images. RESULTS: The detectability of primary lesions was better on PET-CT images than on MD-CT images (p = 0.0023). We observed no significant differences in the SUV with respect to staging, tumor grade, lymphatic or vessel invasion, and macroscopic type; however, primary tumor size analysis revealed that tumors larger than 3 cm had a higher SUV than those smaller than 3 cm. The sensitivity of PET-CT for detecting lymph node metastasis was lower than that of MD-CT, but the specificity of PET-CT was higher than that of MD-CT. CONCLUSIONS: The SUV of primary cancers tends to increase in proportion to tumor size. Although the value of PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastasis is limited, PET -positive lymph nodes can be considered metastatic.
Authors: C Kulinna; R Eibel; W Matzek; H Bonel; D Aust; T Strauss; M Reiser; J Scheidler Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: I J Park; H C Kim; C S Yu; M H Ryu; H M Chang; J H Kim; J S Ryu; J S Yeo; J C Kim Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: H Abdel-Nabi; R J Doerr; D M Lamonica; V R Cronin; P J Galantowicz; G M Carbone; M B Spaulding Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Davey; A G Heriot; J Mackay; E Drummond; A Hogg; S Ngan; A D Milner; R J Hicks Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Minjong Lee; Tae Sung Yeum; Ji Won Kim; Sohee Oh; Shin Ae Lee; Hong Ran Moon; Young Hoon Choi; Yoo Min Han; Ji Min Choi; Dong Kee Jang Journal: Gut Liver Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.519