Literature DB >> 17609993

Evaluating supportive cancer care: are we missing an opportunity?

Marja Verhoef, Laura Weeks, Alison Brazier, Anne Leis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cancer care can be described as a system or complex network of interventions delivered at various times and places with different intentions. CANCER CARE AS A SYSTEM: Cancer care can include medical treatments, psychosocial care, complementary and alternative medicine, self-care, as well as the process of healing and the context in which care is delivered. EVALUATING CANCER CARE: Whereas evaluating individual cancer treatments can be difficult, evaluating cancer care is even more challenging and requires a research framework that relies on methodologies capable of addressing its holistic, individualized, and complex nature. IN
SUMMARY: We suggest that research frameworks focused on studying complex or whole systems are a promising evaluation approach and an opportunity for further exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17609993     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0289-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  13 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life and breast cancer: relationship to psychosocial variables.

Authors:  S L Shapiro; A M Lopez; G E Schwartz; R Bootzin; A J Figueredo; C J Braden; S F Kurker
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-04

2.  An alternative paradigm for clinical nursing research: an exemplar.

Authors:  Souraya Sidani; Dana R Epstein; Patricia Moritz
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  On the need for a new psychotherapy research paradigm: comment on Westen, Novotny, and Thompson-Brenner (2004).

Authors:  Marvin R Goldfried; Catherine Eubanks-Carter
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Rethinking research on psychosocial interventions in biopsychosocial oncology: an essay written in honor of the scholarly contributions of Bernard H. Fox.

Authors:  Lydia R Temoshok
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 5.  Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life.

Authors:  B L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-08

6.  A whole systems research approach to cancer care: why do we need it and how do we get started?

Authors:  Marja J Verhoef; Laura C Vanderheyden; Vinjar Fønnebø
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Integrative medicine and systemic outcomes research: issues in the emergence of a new model for primary health care.

Authors:  Iris R Bell; Opher Caspi; Gary E R Schwartz; Kathryn L Grant; Tracy W Gaudet; David Rychener; Victoria Maizes; Andrew Weil
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-28

8.  Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized experiments.

Authors:  T J Meyer; M M Mark
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 9.  Critical review of psychosocial interventions in cancer care.

Authors:  F I Fawzy; N W Fawzy; L A Arndt; R O Pasnau
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1995-02

10.  Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Z Di Blasi; E Harkness; E Ernst; A Georgiou; J Kleijnen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Individualised and complex experiences of integrative cancer support care: combining qualitative and quantitative data.

Authors:  Helen E Seers; Nicola Gale; Charlotte Paterson; Helen J Cooke; Veronica Tuffrey; Marie J Polley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Coordination of palliative cancer care in the community: "unfinished business".

Authors:  Kevin Brazil; Daryl Bainbridge; Jonathan Sussman; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien; Nancy Pyette
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Perception of risk and communication among conventional and complementary health care providers involving cancer patients' use of complementary therapies: a literature review.

Authors:  Trine Stub; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury; Joanne C Sandberg; Agnete E Kristoffersen; Frauke Musial; Anita Salamonsen
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.659

4.  Principles to guide integrative oncology and the development of an evidence base.

Authors:  A M Leis; L C Weeks; M J Verhoef
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.