Literature DB >> 17101757

A whole systems research approach to cancer care: why do we need it and how do we get started?

Marja J Verhoef1, Laura C Vanderheyden, Vinjar Fønnebø.   

Abstract

Because cancer care is presently developing into a complicated network of interventions delivered at different times and places with different intentions, there is a need to consider whether the current research approaches in clinical cancer care adequately cover the ongoing treatment choices and combinations. Researchers in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are proposing whole systems research as an additional research approach for modern systems of care, whether they include complementary and alternative medicine or not. The current status of whole systems research methodology development is mainly theoretical. Necessary components of the methodology include focus on interventions, context, process, outcomes, and philosophy. Further development should be based on observational studies using both qualitative and quantitative approaches, often combined. Only when modern healthseeking systems of treatment behaviors are thoroughly understood should fine-tuning of hypothesis-testing research methods be continued.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17101757     DOI: 10.1177/1534735406295041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1534-7354            Impact factor:   3.279


  12 in total

1.  Evaluating supportive cancer care: are we missing an opportunity?

Authors:  Marja Verhoef; Laura Weeks; Alison Brazier; Anne Leis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The Peter Brojde lung cancer centre: a model of integrative practice.

Authors:  M Grossman; J Agulnik; G Batist
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Effects of questionnaire-based diagnosis and training on inter-rater reliability among practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine.

Authors:  Scott Mist; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Mikel Aickin
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 4.  What is the state of the evidence on the mind-cancer survival question, and where do we go from here? A point of view.

Authors:  Joanne E Stephen; Michelle Rahn; Marja Verhoef; Anne Leis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  A systematic review of integrative oncology programs.

Authors:  D M Seely; L C Weeks; S Young
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Patient education integrated with acupuncture for relief of cancer-related fatigue randomized controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Michael F Johnston; Ron D Hays; Saskia K Subramanian; Robert M Elashoff; Eleanor K Axe; Jie-Jia Li; Irene Kim; Roberto B Vargas; Jihey Lee; LuGe Yang; Ka-Kit Hui
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 3.659

7.  Chinese medicine and biomodulation in cancer patients--Part one.

Authors:  S M Sagar; R K Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Evaluating complex health interventions: a critical analysis of the 'outcomes' concept.

Authors:  Charlotte Paterson; Charlotte Baarts; Laila Launsø; Marja J Verhoef
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Principles to guide integrative oncology and the development of an evidence base.

Authors:  A M Leis; L C Weeks; M J Verhoef
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  How do we evaluate outcome in an integrative oncology program?

Authors:  S M Sagar
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.