Literature DB >> 17609076

Chlamydia trachomatis testing among 13-25-year-olds in non-genitourinary medicine settings.

Lisa M Williamson1, Gordon Scott, Katy Carrick-Anderson, Kirsten Kernaghan, Graham J Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this paper we examine Chlamydia trachomatis testing in settings other than genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics, focusing on the factors associated with chlamydial infection and with postal testing.
METHODS: Analysis of tests collected from young people aged 13-25 years (n = 4475) between May 2001 and June 2004 via postal testing kits, at a local sexual health clinic, and at further education colleges in Lothian, Scotland.
RESULTS: 84.8% of the testers were female and 15.2% were male. 84 men (12.3%, 95% CI 10.1-15.0) and 403 women (10.6%, 95% CI 9.7-11.6) tested positive. The odds of a positive result was nearly doubled for postal and clinic testers, relative to college testers; and increased by 70% for 16-19-year-olds, compared with 13-15-year-olds. Postal testing was the main source for men (80.2%) while 46.1% of women used postal and 48.1% used clinic testing. Postal testing was significantly associated with age, sex and National Health Service (NHS) board area, with odds increasing with age, and lower odds among females than males, and among Lothian residents than those outwith this NHS board area.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial chlamydial infection was apparent among the young people in this study and positivity rates were highest among postal and clinic testers and those in the 16-19-year age group. While postal kits were the main source for men, and should be used to target them, the combination of this approach with continuing screening programmes in clinic settings would be most effective at targeting those most at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17609076     DOI: 10.1783/147118907781005083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1471-1893


  6 in total

Review 1.  Home versus clinic-based specimen collection for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Anna S Graseck; Shirley L Shih; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Screening for sexually transmitted infections at home or in the clinic?

Authors:  Shirley L Shih; Anna S Graseck; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.915

3.  Knowledge of Chlamydia trachomatis among men and women approached to participate in community-based screening, Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Karen Lorimer; Graham J Hart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Delivery of chlamydia screening to young women requesting emergency hormonal contraception at pharmacies in Manchester, UK: a prospective study.

Authors:  Loretta Brabin; Grace Thomas; Mark Hopkins; Karen O'Brien; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 5.  Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad S Jamil; Jane S Hocking; Heidi M Bauer; Hammad Ali; Handan Wand; Kirsty Smith; Jennifer Walker; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Utilisation of pharmacy-based sexual and reproductive health services: a quantitative retrospective study.

Authors:  Julia Gauly; Helen Atherton; Peter K Kimani; Jonathan Ross
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.519

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.