Literature DB >> 17608550

Frequency of Le Fort I osteotomy after repaired cleft lip and palate or cleft palate.

Phoebe M Good1, John B Mulliken, Bonnie L Padwa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diminished maxillary growth is a consequence of labiopalatal repair, and many patients with cleft lip and palate require Le Fort I advancement. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of maxillary hypoplasia as measured by need for Le Fort I.
SUBJECTS: Retrospective cohort study of males born before 1987 and females before 1989. Records of 173 patients with cleft lip and palate and 34 with cleft palate were reviewed.
METHODS: Documented age, gender, cleft type, and need for Le Fort I. Pearson chi-square and Fischer's exact analyses were performed to evaluate the frequency of Le Fort I.
RESULTS: Of 217 patients with cleft lip and palate or cleft palate, 40 were syndromic; of the remaining 177 patients, 69 had cleft lip, 78 had cleft lip and palate, and 30 had cleft palate. Thirty-seven of 177 patients (20.9%) required Le Fort I, subcategorized by cleft type: 0/69 for cleft lip, 37/78 for cleft lip and palate, and 0/35 for cleft palate (p<.0001). Of the 37/78 (47.4%) cleft lip and palate patients, the frequency of Le Fort I correlated with severity: 5/22 unilateral incomplete cleft lip and palate; 16/33 unilateral complete cleft lip and palate; 1/2 bilateral incomplete cleft lip and palate; 2/4 bilateral asymmetric complete/incomplete cleft lip and palate; 13/17 bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (p<.05).
CONCLUSION: Overall frequency of Le Fort I was 20.9% in patients with cleft lip and palate and cleft palate. Of those with cleft lip and palate, 47.7% required maxillary advancement, but none with isolated cleft lip or cleft palate required correction. Frequency of Le Fort I osteotomy correlated with the spectrum of severity of labiopalatal clefting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17608550     DOI: 10.1597/06-075.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  16 in total

1.  Long-Term Incisal Relationships After Palatoplasty in Patients With Isolated Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Albert S Woo; Derick A Mendonca; Donald V Huebener; Richard J Nissen; Gary B Skolnick; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Perceptual speech assessment after maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with a repaired cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Seok-Kwun Kim; Ju-Chan Kim; Ju-Bong Moon; Keun-Cheol Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10

3.  The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Compared to Non-Syndromic Skeletal Class III Patients.

Authors:  Benedetta Bollato; Martina Barone; Antonio Gracco; Ugo Baciliero; Giorgia Crivellin; Giovanni Bruno; Alberto De Stefani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Repair of bilateral cleft lip and its variants.

Authors:  John B Mulliken
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10

5.  Dimensions of Velopharyngeal Space following Maxillary Advancement with Le Fort I Osteotomy Compared to Zisser Segmental Osteotomy: A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Furkan Erol Karabekmez; Johannes Kleinheinz; Susanne Jung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Extent of maxillary deficiency in patients with complete UCLP and BCLP.

Authors:  Jörg A Lisson; Catharina Weyrich
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Long-term mid-facial growth of patients with a unilateral complete cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated by two-stage palatoplasty: cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  I F P M Kappen; G K P Bittermann; R M Schouten; D Bittermann; E Etty; R Koole; M Kon; A B Mink van der Molen; C C Breugem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A machine learning framework for automated diagnosis and computer-assisted planning in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Paul G M Knoops; Athanasios Papaioannou; Alessandro Borghi; Richard W F Breakey; Alexander T Wilson; Owase Jeelani; Stefanos Zafeiriou; Derek Steinbacher; Bonnie L Padwa; David J Dunaway; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Effect of Cleft Orthognathic and Nasal Reconstruction on Perceived Social Traits.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Posnick; Srinivas M Susarla; Brian E Kinard
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  Orthognathic Consequences of Sphincter Pharyngoplasty in Cleft Patients: A 2-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Frances Yoshikane; Li Han Lai; Brian K Hui; Deborah B Martins; Gina Farias-Eisner; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Han Hoang; James P Bradley; Libby Wilson; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.