Literature DB >> 17608145

Dopamine receptor antagonists reverse amphetamine-induced behavioral alteration on a differential reinforcement for low-rate (DRL) operant task in the rat.

Ruey-Kuang Cheng1, Ruey-Ming Liao.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that amphetamine significantly alters operant responding on the behavior maintained on a schedule of differential reinforcement of low-rate (DRL). As such, behavioral deficiency of DRL responding has been observed by the drug-induced increase of non-reinforced responses and a leftward shift of inter-response time (IRT) curve on DRL responding in the rat. However, the neurochemical basis for amphetamine-induced DRL behavioral alternations remain to be elucidated. The present study was then designed to examine whether the effects of amphetamine were dependent on dopamine-subtyped receptors, this was carried out by the co-administration of the selective D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, SCH23390 and raclopride respectively. Rats were first trained to perform on DRL 10-sec task and then divided into four groups, which received separate types of double injections before the behavioral session. The four groups were the saline control group, the amphetamine alone group, the dopamine antagonist alone group, and the combination of [corrected] amphetamine and dopamine antagonist group. The saline control group performed DRL responding in an efficient manner with a major index for the peak time of the IRT curve, which was fairly localized within the 10-sec bin throughout the test phase. The subjects injected with amphetamine (1 mg/kg) significantly shortened IRT that led to a leftward shift of IRT curve, which was further revealed by a decreased peak time without significant effectiveness on the peak rate and burst response. Even though the group given SCH23390 or raclopride alone showed profound disruption on DRL behavior by flattening the IRT curve, the co-administration of amphetamine with SCH23390 or raclopride reversed the aforementioned amphetamine-induced behavioral deficiency on DRL task. Together, these results suggest that the dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are involved and important to the temporal regulation of DRL response under psychostimulant drug treatment. Furthermore, this highlights the involvement of the brain dopamine systems in the temporal regulation of DRL behavior performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17608145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Physiol        ISSN: 0304-4920            Impact factor:   1.764


  10 in total

1.  Performance on an impulse control task is altered in adult rats exposed to amphetamine during adolescence.

Authors:  Emily R Hankosky; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.038

2.  Comparative effects of cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist and antagonist on timing impulsivity induced by d-amphetamine in a differential reinforcement of low-rate response task in male rats.

Authors:  Shuo-Fu Chen; Wei-Chung Hsu; Xi-Yun Lu; Chuen-Yu Chuang; Ruey-Ming Liao
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Dissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions.

Authors:  J David Jentsch; James R Ashenhurst; M Catalina Cervantes; Stephanie M Groman; Alexander S James; Zachary T Pennington
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Habit formation and the loss of control of an internal clock: inverse relationship between the level of baseline training and the clock-speed enhancing effects of methamphetamine.

Authors:  Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Oshri L Hakak; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Dissociations between interval timing and intertemporal choice following administration of fluoxetine, cocaine, or methamphetamine.

Authors:  Sarah R Heilbronner; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 6.  Dopamine and the interdependency of time perception and reward.

Authors:  Bowen J Fung; Elissa Sutlief; Marshall G Hussain Shuler
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 9.052

Review 7.  Impulsive actions and choices in laboratory animals and humans: effects of high vs. low dopamine states produced by systemic treatments given to neurologically intact subjects.

Authors:  Valérie D'Amour-Horvat; Marco Leyton
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Dopamine D2 Receptors in Dopaminergic Neurons Modulate Performance in a Reversal Learning Task in Mice.

Authors:  Jérôme Linden; Alexander S James; Colin McDaniel; J David Jentsch
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-03-08

9.  Systemic administration of 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride, but not SCH23390, alters loss-chasing behavior in the rat.

Authors:  Robert D Rogers; Adeline Wong; Chris McKinnon; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Task-Dependent Effects of SKF83959 on Operant Behaviors Associated With Distinct Changes of CaMKII Signaling in Striatal Subareas.

Authors:  Pei-Pei Liu; Chih-Chang Chao; Ruey-Ming Liao
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.176

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.