Literature DB >> 17605194

Minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty.

Piotr Wojciechowski1, Damian Kusz, Konrad Kopeć, Marcin Borowski.   

Abstract

The success of operative treatment depends on a quick recovery of limb function. Every injury to a muscle or its attachment is associated with decreased muscle strength and disturbed proprioception, which impedes functional recovery. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is defined as a surgical technique performed through a short skin incision to avoid injury to muscles and tendons. The advantages of MIS over the classic technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty include: faster recovery, shorter rehabilitation and hospital stay, decreased blood loss, less pain and a shorter scar. The anterior approach to the hip, first described by Robert Judet in 1947 as a modified Smith-Petersen approach, follows the principles of MIS. Other approaches advertised as minimally invasive (posterior, lateral, or double incision approach) are associated with muscle and/or tendon injury. Therefore, they should be referred to as Less Invasive Surgery (LIS). Complications of THA performed with the MIS technique occur most often in women with osteoporosis, above 65 years of age, or with a BMI of more than 32. The rate of complications doubles with surgeons performing less than 50 THAs per year. A special set of instruments facilitates implantation of the endoprosthesis and reduces the number of complications. The anterior approach allows for implantation of an endoprosthesis without damage to muscles and their insertions, reduces tissue damage and, more importantly, decreases the intensity of postoperative pain. Should complications occur, the anterior approach has the advantage of allowing simple access to the proximal femur by extending the approach distally, as in the Smith-Petersen technique. However, the technical challenges of MIS and the risk of complications warrant caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17605194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil        ISSN: 1509-3492


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Drainage of a complicated high perianal abscess: a bilateral ilioinguinal approach.

Authors:  M-C Hsieh; W-S Huang; C-C Chin; Y-H Kuo; K-T Peng
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  A new anterolateral surgical approach for total hip replacement.

Authors:  Giovanni F Grano; Maria Pavlidou; Alberto Todesco; Augusto Palermo; Luigi Molfetta
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-09-21

4.  Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted total hip arthroplasty versus lateral approach in Total Hip Replacement. A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Stylianos Tottas; Christina Tsigalou; Athanasios Ververidis; Ioannis E Kougioumtzis; Makrina Karaglani; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Christos Chatzipapas; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-16

5.  Blood management and transfusion strategies in 600 patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: an analysis of pre-operative autologous blood donation.

Authors:  Paolo Perazzo; Marco Viganò; Laura De Girolamo; Francesco Verde; Anna Vinci; Giuseppe Banfi; Sergio Romagnoli
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty. A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches.

Authors:  Siri B Winther; Vigdis S Husby; Olav A Foss; Tina S Wik; Svein Svenningsen; Monika Engdal; Kristin Haugan; Otto S Husby
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.