Literature DB >> 17604693

Information needs and decision-making preferences: comparing findings for gynaecological, breast and colorectal cancer.

Kinta Beaver1, Katie Booth.   

Abstract

This study examined information needs and decision-making preferences for women with gynaecological cancers (n=53) using structured interviews and compared findings to previous work involving breast and colorectal cancer patients. Measures of information needs (Information Needs Questionnaire) and decision-making preferences (Control Preferences Scale) were administered to women with gynaecological cancers, consistent with measures previously administered to breast (n=150) and colorectal (n=42) cancer patients. Therefore, statistical comparisons could be made across study groups. Priority information needs were similar across the three cancer groups and related to information about likelihood of cure, spread of disease and treatment options. Patients across study groups preferred to share or delegate decision-making to doctors, rather than make decisions themselves. However, patients with gynaecological and colorectal cancers were more likely to have achieved their preferred role in decision-making than women with breast cancer. There were clear similarities in priority information needs across cancer patients groups. However, decision-making preferences need to be established on an individual basis to ensure that patients are involved in the decision-making process to the extent that they prefer. The research instruments used in this study have potential as clinical guides to enable health professionals to make an individual assessment of needs and preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17604693     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  26 in total

1.  Information needs and Internet use in urological and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Beatriz Valero-Aguilera; Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; José Francisco García-Gutiérrez; Jaime Jiménez-Pernett; José Manuel Cózar-Olmo; Rosario Guerrero-Tejada; Rubén Alba-Ruiz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Gender differences in the evolution of illness understanding among patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Kalen Fletcher; Holly G Prigerson; Elizabeth Paulk; Jennifer Temel; Esme Finlay; Lisa Marr; Ruth McCorkle; Lorna Rivera; Francisco Munoz; Paul K Maciejewski
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2003-2008.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Benmei Liu; Samantha Post; Bradford Hesse
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Cancer patients' preferences for control at the end of life.

Authors:  Deborah L Volker; Hung-Lan Wu
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 5.  Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection.

Authors:  Zhi-jie Cong; Liang-hao Hu; Jun-jie Xing; Zheng-qian Bian; Chuan-gang Fu; En-da Yu; Zhao-shen Li; Ming Zhong
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

6.  Learning Needs of Gynecologic Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Gulcihan Akkuzu; Gonul Kurt; Gulten Guvenc; Gulsah Kok; Sevgi Simsek; Safiye Dogrusoy; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp; Seema Singhal; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Tariman; D L Berry; B Cochrane; A Doorenbos; K Schepp
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Patients' preferences on information and involvement in decision making for gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Emilie Uldry; Markus Schäfer; Alend Saadi; Valentin Rousson; Nicolas Demartines
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Risk factors associated with sphincter-preserving resection in patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Jun-Jie Xing; Wei Zhang; Chuan-Gang Fu; En-Da Yu; Ming Zhong
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.