Christopher Paul Szabo1, Clifford W Allwood. 1. Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown,Johannesburg, South Africa. Christopher.Szabo@wits.ac.za
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eating disorders have traditionally been associated with the white community in South Africa. The emergence of eating disorders among blacks in the mid 1990's appeared to signal a demographic shift. Subsequent data suggested that eating disorders would increase in prevalence amongst black South Africans. OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to explore body figure preference in a cross cultural South African sample, given the established relationship between body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. METHODS: The sample comprised a community based, multi-racial adolescent population in both urban (n=1353) and rural (n=361) areas. The Body Figure Preference Test [BFPT] was administered. RESULTS: Most urban respondents had a desire to be smaller (white=72%; black=61%), whereas rural black respondents were more evenly divided amongst those who were content (31%), desiring to be larger (29%) and desiring to be smaller (40%) [Chi square value=105.309, df=4, p=0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study demonstrate that racial homogenization exists regarding body figure preference within the urban setting. Data from the rural area suggests milieu specific factors in this regard with fewer respondents desiring to be smaller. This may have implications for the emergence of eating disorders in black South African populations, more specifically those in urban areas.
BACKGROUND:Eating disorders have traditionally been associated with the white community in South Africa. The emergence of eating disorders among blacks in the mid 1990's appeared to signal a demographic shift. Subsequent data suggested that eating disorders would increase in prevalence amongst black South Africans. OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to explore body figure preference in a cross cultural South African sample, given the established relationship between body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. METHODS: The sample comprised a community based, multi-racial adolescent population in both urban (n=1353) and rural (n=361) areas. The Body Figure Preference Test [BFPT] was administered. RESULTS: Most urban respondents had a desire to be smaller (white=72%; black=61%), whereas rural black respondents were more evenly divided amongst those who were content (31%), desiring to be larger (29%) and desiring to be smaller (40%) [Chi square value=105.309, df=4, p=0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study demonstrate that racial homogenization exists regarding body figure preference within the urban setting. Data from the rural area suggests milieu specific factors in this regard with fewer respondents desiring to be smaller. This may have implications for the emergence of eating disorders in black South African populations, more specifically those in urban areas.
Authors: Ruth H Striegel-Moore; Faith A Dohm; Helena C Kraemer; C Barr Taylor; Stephen Daniels; Patricia B Crawford; George B Schreiber Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: E O Okoro; B A Oyejola; E N Etebu; H Sholagberu; P M Kolo; A Chijioke; S A Adebisi Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Walid El Ansari; Susanne Vodder Clausen; Andi Mabhala; Christiane Stock Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Titilola M Pedro; Lisa K Micklesfield; Kathleen Kahn; Stephen M Tollman; John M Pettifor; Shane A Norris Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alessandra Prioreschi; Stephanie V Wrottesley; Emmanuel Cohen; Ankita Reddy; Rihlat Said-Mohamed; Rhian Twine; Stephen M Tollman; Kathleen Kahn; David B Dunger; Shane A Norris Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zandile June-Rose Mchiza; Whadi-Ah Parker; Ronel Sewpaul; Sunday Olawale Onagbiye; Demetre Labadarios Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Catherine E Draper; Lisa K Micklesfield; Kathleen Kahn; Stephen M Tollman; John M Pettifor; David B Dunger; Shane A Norris Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 3.295