| Literature DB >> 27171420 |
Titilola M Pedro1, Lisa K Micklesfield1, Kathleen Kahn2, Stephen M Tollman2, John M Pettifor1, Shane A Norris1.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the associations between BMI, disordered eating attitude, body dissatisfaction in female adolescents, and descriptive attributes assigned to silhouettes of varying sizes in male and female adolescents, aged 11 to 15, in rural South Africa. Height and weight were measured to determine BMI. Age and sex-specific cut-offs for underweight and overweight/obesity were determined using the International Obesity Task Force cut-offs. Body image satisfaction using Feel-Ideal Discrepancy (FID) scores, Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), and perceptual female silhouettes were collected through self-administered questionnaires in 385 adolescents from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System (HSDSS). Participants self-reported their Tanner pubertal stage and were classified as early pubertal (< = Tanner stage 2), and mid to post pubertal (Tanner stage > 2). Mid to post pubertal boys and girls were significantly heavier, taller, and had higher BMI values than their early pubertal counterparts (all p<0.001). The prevalence of overweight and obesity was higher in the girls than the boys in both pubertal stages. The majority (83.5%) of the girls demonstrated body dissatisfaction (a desire to be thinner or fatter). The girls who wanted to be fatter had a significantly higher BMI than the girls who wanted to be thinner (p<0.001). There were no differences in EAT-26 scores between pubertal groups, within the same sex, and between boys and girls within the two pubertal groups. The majority of the boys and the girls in both pubertal groups perceived the underweight silhouettes to be "unhappy" and "weak" and the majority of girls in both pubertal groups perceived the normal silhouettes to be the "best". These findings suggest a need for policy intervention that will address a healthy body size among South African adolescents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27171420 PMCID: PMC4865095 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Subjects characteristics by sex and pubertal stages of development.
| Variables | Early pubertal stage (Tanner stages 1 & 2) | Significant differences by sex | Mid to post pubertal stage (Tanner stages > 2) | Significant differences by sex | Significant differences by pubertal stages (A & B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys (N = 99) | Girls (N = 73) | Boys (N = 91) | Girls (N = 122) | ||||
| 12.6±1.2 | 12.2±1.0 | 14.5±1.4 | 14.4±1.3 | 0.547 | |||
| 36.4±7.1 | 38.7±1.0 | 0.074 | 49.4±11.1 | 53.3±12.0 | |||
| 146.0±8.1 | 147.5±8.0 | 0.203 | 161.4±10.1 | 158.1±6.4 | |||
| 17.0±2.0 | 17.5±3.3 | 0.198 | 19.0±2.6 | 21.2±4.0 | |||
| 10 (6–15) | 12 (6–17) | 0.180 | 12 (9–15) | 10 (6–14) | 0.067 | 0.833 | |
| Dieting | 4.8 (2–7) | 4.9 (3–6) | 0.871 | 5.5 (3–7) | 5.1 (3–7) | 0.174 | 0.516 |
| Bulimia and food preoccupation | 2.4 (0–4) | 2.0 (0–3) | 0.424 | 2.4 (0–3) | 1.8 (0–3) | 0.064 | 0.618 |
| Oral control | 3.4 (0–6) | 4.7 (1–7) | 3.9 (1–6) | 3.4 (1–6) | 0.015 | 0.921 | |
| Underweight | 4(4.0%) | 7(9.6%) | 0.01 ( | 6(6.6%) | 4(3.3%) | 0.001 ( | 0.452 |
| Normal weight | 93(94.0%) | 58(79.3%) | 82(90.1%) | 94(77.1%) | |||
| Overweight and obesed combined | 2(2.0%) | 8(11.1%) | 3(3.3%) | 24(19.7%) | |||
| EAT-26 score < 20 | 85(89.5%) | 59(89.4%) | 0.978 | 82(92.1%) | 103(92.0%) | 0.965 | 0.701 |
| EAT-26 score ≥ 20 | 10(10.5%) | 7(10.6%) | 7(7.1%) | 9(8.0%) | |||
All values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data (Student t test), median IQR reported for non normally distributed data and n(%) for categorical data. Comparison by sex and pubertal stages were completed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (median, IQR reported). χ2-tests were used to determine significant differences for BMI and EAT-26 cut-offs categories.
A—Significant differences between early and mid-post pubertal stage in boys.
B—Significant differences between early and mid-post pubertal stage in girls.
*Variation in sample size due to missing information.
IOTF age and gender specific BMI cut-offs for age 12.5 and 14.5 years adolescent boys and girls [27].
Fig 1Female adolescents’ body image dissatisfaction.
Difference in BMI between the FID categories.
| Early-Pubertal Girls (n = 70) | Mid to Post-Pubertal Girls (n = 118) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±sd | Mean±sd | ||
| 20.41±4.1 [n = 13] | 23.81±4.9 [n = 35] | 0.001 | |
| 17.35±1.7 [n = 14] | 21.04±2.7 [n = 17] | ||
| 16.68±3.0 [n = 43] | 19.89±3.1 [n = 66] | 0.001 |
Values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) using ANOVA (one-way).
C—Significant differences in BMI between girls who desired to be fatter and those girls who are satisfied with their current body sizes.
D—Significant differences in BMI between girls who desired to be thinner and those girls who are satisfied with their current body sizes.
Characteristics of Stunkard’s silhouettes chosen by early and mid to post pubertal girls to represent different dimensions of body image.
| 3.0±1.6 vs. 3.5±1.4 | 0.331 | |||
| 4.3±1.8 vs. 4.1±1.5 | ||||
| 1.3±1.9 vs. 0.5±1.8 | 0.244 | |||
| 1.9±1.5 vs. 2.5±0.6 | 3.0±1.5 vs. 3.3±1.3 | 4.1±1.5 vs. 4.5±1.5 | 0.669 | |
| 4.8±1.9 vs. 3.5±0.6 | 4.3±1.9 vs. 4.1±1.4 | 3.8±1.0 vs. 4.0±1.5 | 0.637 | |
| 3.0±1.0 vs. 1.0±0.8 | 1.2±1.9 vs. 0.7±1.6 | 0.4±1.8 vs. −0.5±2.0 | 0.399 | |
Values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) using ANOVA (one-way).
Female body silhouettes with attributes as assessed by early and mid to post pubertal girls.
| Silhouettes | Early-Pubertal Girls | Mid to Post-Pubertal Girls | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | 19.0% | 14.5% | |
| Normal | 50.0% | 60.0% | 0.471 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 31.0% | 25.5% | |
| Underweight | 31.0% | 29.0% | |
| Normal | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.963 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 69.0% | 70.0% | |
| Underweight | 54.4% | 52.1% | |
| Normal | 4.4% | 1.7% | 0.466 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 41.2% | 46.2% | |
| Underweight | 20.5% | 16.2% | |
| Normal | 38.1% | 34.2% | 0.590 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 41.4% | 49.6% | |
| Underweight | 26.5% | 36.7% | |
| Normal | 7.4% | 14.5% | 0.134 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 66.1% | 47.8% | |
| Underweight | 4.4% | 6.7% | |
| Normal | 10.3% | 6.0% | 0.458 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 85.3% | 86.3% | |
| Underweight | 79.4% | 87.2% | |
| Normal | 9.0% | 0.0% | |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 11.6% | 12.8% | |
| Underweight | 16.2% | 14.5% | |
| Normal | 36.6% | 36.7% | 0.849 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 47.2% | 48.8% | |
| Underweight | 84.0% | 85.5% | |
| Normal | 0.0% | 6.0% | 0.030 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 16.0% | 8.5% | |
Comparison by pubertal stage was computed using χ2-tests and (%) are reported.
Female body silhouettes with attributes as assessed by early and mid to post pubertal boys.
| Silhouettes | Early-Pubertal Boys | Mid to Post-Pubertal Boys | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | 10.5% | 3.3% | |
| Normal | 43.2% | 53.3% | 0.087 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 46.3% | 43.4% | |
| Underweight | 48.4% | 40.0% | |
| Normal | 1.1% | 0.0% | 0.266 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 50.5% | 60.0% | |
| Underweight | 45.3% | 53.3% | |
| Normal | 8.3% | 3.3% | 0.436 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 46.4% | 43.4% | |
| Underweight | 6.3% | 15.6% | |
| Normal | 34.7% | 25.6% | 0.175 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 59.0% | 58.8% | |
| Underweight | 35.8% | 35.6% | |
| Normal | 9.5% | 7.7% | 0.918 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 54.7% | 56.7% | |
| Underweight | 6.3% | 3.3% | |
| Normal | 6.3% | 6.6% | 0.798 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 87.4% | 90.1% | |
| Underweight | 83.2% | 90.0% | |
| Normal | 7.3% | 2.2% | 0.228 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 9.5% | 7.8% | |
| Underweight | 9.5% | 10.0% | |
| Normal | 35.8% | 36.7% | 0.929 |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 54.7% | 53.3% | |
| Underweight | 91.5% | 90.0% | |
| Normal | 1.1% | 0.0% | |
| Overweight and obesed combined | 7.4% | 10.0% | |
Comparison by pubertal stage was computed using χ2-tests and (%) are reported.