BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO; Epoetin-alpha; PROCRITtrade mark) has been shown to exert neuroprotective and restorative effects in a variety of CNS injury models. However, limited information is available regarding the dose levels required for these beneficial effects or the neuronal responses that may underlie them. Here we have investigated the dose-response to rhEPO and compared the effects of rhEPO with those of carbamylated rhEPO (CEPO) in a model of cerebral stroke in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rats subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) were treated with rhEPO or CEPO, starting at 6 h and repeated at 24 and 48 h, after MCAo. Cerebral infarct volumes were assessed at 28 days and neurological impairment at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, post-MCAo. KEY RESULTS: rhEPO at dose levels of 500, 1150 or 5000 IU kg(-1) or CEPO at a dose level of 50 microg kg(-1) significantly reduced cortical infarct volume and reduced neurologic impairment. All doses of rhEPO, but not CEPO, produced a transient increase in haematocrit, while rhEPO and CEPO substantially reduced the number of apoptotic cells and activated microglia in the ischemic boundary region. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data indicate that rhEPO and CEPO have anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects, even with administration at 6 h following embolic MCAo in rats. Taken together, these actions of rhEPO and CEPO are likely to contribute to their reduction of neurologic impairment following cerebral ischemia.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recombinant humanerythropoietin (rhEPO; Epoetin-alpha; PROCRITtrade mark) has been shown to exert neuroprotective and restorative effects in a variety of CNS injury models. However, limited information is available regarding the dose levels required for these beneficial effects or the neuronal responses that may underlie them. Here we have investigated the dose-response to rhEPO and compared the effects of rhEPO with those of carbamylated rhEPO (CEPO) in a model of cerebral stroke in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rats subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo) were treated with rhEPO or CEPO, starting at 6 h and repeated at 24 and 48 h, after MCAo. Cerebral infarct volumes were assessed at 28 days and neurological impairment at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, post-MCAo. KEY RESULTS: rhEPO at dose levels of 500, 1150 or 5000 IU kg(-1) or CEPO at a dose level of 50 microg kg(-1) significantly reduced cortical infarct volume and reduced neurologic impairment. All doses of rhEPO, but not CEPO, produced a transient increase in haematocrit, while rhEPO and CEPO substantially reduced the number of apoptotic cells and activated microglia in the ischemic boundary region. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data indicate that rhEPO and CEPO have anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects, even with administration at 6 h following embolic MCAo in rats. Taken together, these actions of rhEPO and CEPO are likely to contribute to their reduction of neurologic impairment following cerebral ischemia.
Authors: P Lewczuk; M Hasselblatt; H Kamrowski-Kruck; A Heyer; C Unzicker; A L Sirén; H Ehrenreich Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2000-11-09 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Pia Villa; Johan van Beek; Anna Kirstine Larsen; Jens Gerwien; Søren Christensen; Anthony Cerami; Michael Brines; Marcel Leist; Pietro Ghezzi; Lars Torup Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: A L Sirén; M Fratelli; M Brines; C Goemans; S Casagrande; P Lewczuk; S Keenan; C Gleiter; C Pasquali; A Capobianco; T Mennini; R Heumann; A Cerami; H Ehrenreich; P Ghezzi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-03-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M L Brines; P Ghezzi; S Keenan; D Agnello; N C de Lanerolle; C Cerami; L M Itri; A Cerami Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-09-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Z G Zhang; L Zhang; W Tsang; A Goussev; C Powers; K L Ho; D Morris; S S Smyth; B S Coller; M Chopp Journal: Brain Res Date: 2001-09-07 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Davide Agnello; Paolo Bigini; Pia Villa; Tiziana Mennini; Anthony Cerami; Michael L Brines; Pietro Ghezzi Journal: Brain Res Date: 2002-10-11 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Guangliang Ding; Quan Jiang; Lian Li; Li Zhang; Ying Wang; Zheng Gang Zhang; Mei Lu; Swayamprava Panda; Qingjiang Li; James R Ewing; Michael Chopp Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Manuela Mengozzi; Ilaria Cervellini; Pia Villa; Zübeyde Erbayraktar; Necati Gökmen; Osman Yilmaz; Serhat Erbayraktar; Mathini Manohasandra; Paul Van Hummelen; Peter Vandenabeele; Yuti Chernajovsky; Alexander Annenkov; Pietro Ghezzi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205