Literature DB >> 17603050

Differing mechanisms of meiotic segregation in spermatozoa from three carriers of a pericentric inversion of chromosome 8.

Emilie Caer1, Aurore Perrin, Nathalie Douet-Guilbert, Véronique Amice, Marc De Braekeleer, Frédéric Morel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the meiotic segregation of a pericentric inversion of chromosome 8 in three carriers.
DESIGN: Analysis of sperm nuclei by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Three males with an inv(8). INTERVENTION(S): Triple FISH with the 8q and 8p subtelomeres and the specific alphoid of chromosome 9 probes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Meiotic segregation differences between carriers. RESULT(S): The frequencies of nonrecombinant gametes were 97%, 60.94%, and 61.03%. The frequencies of recombinant sperm were 1.44%, 37.71%, and 37.70%, whereas the size of the inverted segment represented 31%, 61%, and 80% of the size of the whole chromosome 8. CONCLUSION(S): Many factors seem to influence the production of recombinant chromosomes: the affected chromosome and involved region, location of the breakpoints, or size of the inverted segment. Our results show that the rate of recombination varies principally according to the size of the inverted segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17603050     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Peining Li; Pawel Pomianowski; Miriam S DiMaio; Joanne R Florio; Michael R Rossi; Bixia Xiang; Fang Xu; Hui Yang; Qian Geng; Jiansheng Xie; Maurice J Mahoney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Studies of male and female meiosis in inv(4)(p1.4;q2.3) pig carriers.

Authors:  Katia Massip; Martine Yerle; Yvon Billon; Stéphane Ferchaud; Nathalie Bonnet; Anne Calgaro; Nicolas Mary; Anne-Marie Dudez; Céline Sentenac; Christophe Plard; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Infertility patients with chromosome inversions are not susceptible to an inter-chromosomal effect.

Authors:  D Young; D Klepacka; M McGarvey; W B Schoolcraft; M G Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Clinical outcomes of Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) application in couples with chromosomal inversion, a study in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Yuhan Shao; Jing Li; Juanjuan Lu; Hongchang Li; Yueting Zhu; Wenjie Jiang; Junhao Yan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  An Adolescent with a Rare De Novo Distal Trisomy 6p and Distal Monosomy 6q Chromosomal Combination.

Authors:  Leia A Peterman; Gail H Vance; Erin E Conboy; Katelynn Anderson; David D Weaver
Journal:  Case Rep Genet       Date:  2020-08-31

6.  Pericentric inversion of chromosome 6 and male fertility problems.

Authors:  Haitao Fan; Zhe Liu; Peng Zhan; Guoliang Jia
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-01-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.