Literature DB >> 17601959

Running in ostriches (Struthio camelus): three-dimensional joint axes alignment and joint kinematics.

Jonas Rubenson1, David G Lloyd, Thor F Besier, Denham B Heliams, Paul A Fournier.   

Abstract

Although locomotor kinematics in walking and running birds have been examined in studies exploring many biological aspects of bipedalism, these studies have been largely limited to two-dimensional analyses. Incorporating a five-segment, 17 degree-of-freedom (d.f.) kinematic model of the ostrich hind limb developed from anatomical specimens, we quantified the three-dimensional (3-D) joint axis alignment and joint kinematics during running (at approximately 3.3 m s(-1)) in the largest avian biped, the ostrich. Our analysis revealed that the majority of the segment motion during running in the ostrich occurs in flexion/extension. Importantly, however, the alignment of the average flexion/extension helical axes of the knee and ankle are rotated externally to the direction of travel (37 degrees and 21 degrees , respectively) so that pure flexion and extension at the knee will act to adduct and adbuct the tibiotarsus relative to the plane of movement, and pure flexion and extension at the ankle will act to abduct and adduct the tarsometatarsus relative to the plane of movement. This feature of the limb anatomy appears to provide the major lateral (non-sagittal) displacement of the lower limb necessary for steering the swinging limb clear of the stance limb and replaces what would otherwise require greater adduction/abduction and/or internal/external rotation, allowing for less complex joints, musculoskeletal geometry and neuromuscular control. Significant rotation about the joints' non-flexion/extension axes nevertheless occurs over the running stride. In particular, hip abduction and knee internal/external and varus/valgus motion may further facilitate limb clearance during the swing phase, and substantial non-flexion/extension movement at the knee is also observed during stance. Measurement of 3-D segment and joint motion in birds will be aided by the use of functionally determined axes of rotation rather than assumed axes, proving important when interpreting the biomechanics and motor control of avian bipedalism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601959     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  33 in total

1.  Adaptations for economical bipedal running: the effect of limb structure on three-dimensional joint mechanics.

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; David G Lloyd; Denham B Heliams; Thor F Besier; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part I-an examination of cancellous bone architecture in the hindlimb bones of theropods.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Belinda R Beck; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Computational modelling of locomotor muscle moment arms in the basal dinosaur Lesothosaurus diagnosticus: assessing convergence between birds and basal ornithischians.

Authors:  Karl T Bates; Susannah C R Maidment; Vivian Allen; Paul M Barrett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Disparity and convergence in bipedal archosaur locomotion.

Authors:  K T Bates; E R Schachner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Whole-bone scaling of the avian pelvic limb.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Stephanie C W Yen; Michał M Kłosowski; Andrew A Farke; John R Hutchinson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  3-D range of motion envelopes reveal interacting degrees of freedom in avian hind limb joints.

Authors:  Robert E Kambic; Thomas J Roberts; Stephen M Gatesy
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Authors:  P J Bishop; C J Clemente; R E Weems; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Hip joint contact force in the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) during normal level walking.

Authors:  Jessica E Goetz; Timothy R Derrick; Douglas R Pedersen; Duane A Robinson; Michael G Conzemius; Thomas E Baer; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The intertarsal joint of the ostrich (Struthio camelus): Anatomical examination and function of passive structures in locomotion.

Authors:  Nina U Schaller; Bernd Herkner; Rikk Villa; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Biomechanics of running indicates endothermy in bipedal dinosaurs.

Authors:  Herman Pontzer; Vivian Allen; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.