Literature DB >> 17601869

Ethics in studies on children and environmental health.

D F Merlo1, L E Knudsen, K Matusiewicz, L Niebrój, K H Vähäkangas.   

Abstract

Children, because of age-related reasons, are a vulnerable population, and protecting their health is a social, scientific and emotional priority. The increased susceptibility of children and fetuses to environmental (including genotoxic) agents has been widely discussed by the scientific community. Children may experience different levels of chemical exposure than adults, and their sensitivity to chemical toxicities may be increased or decreased in comparison with adults. Such considerations also apply to unborn (fetal exposure) and newborn (neonatal exposure) children. Therefore, research on children is necessary in both clinical and environmental fields, to provide age-specific relevant data regarding the efficacy and safety of medical treatments, and regarding the assessment of risk from unintended environmental exposure. In this context, the stakeholders are many, including children and their parents, physicians and public health researchers, and the society as a whole, with its ethical, regulatory, administrative and political components. The important ethical issues are information of participants and consent to participate. Follow-up and protection of data (samples and information derived from samples) should be discussed in the context of biobanks, where children obtain individual rights when they become adults. It is important to realise that there are highly variable practices within European countries, which may have, in the past, led to differences in practical aspects of research in children. A number of recommendations are provided for research with children and environmental health. Environmental research with children should be scientifically justified, with sound research questions and valid study protocols of sufficient statistical power, ensuring the autonomy of the child and his/her family at the time of the study and later in life, if data and samples are used for follow-up studies. When children are enrolled, we recommend a consent dyad, including (1) parental (or legal guardian) informed consent and (2) the child's assent and/or informed consent from older minors. For evaluation of the studies including children, a paediatrician should always be involved in the research ethics committee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601869      PMCID: PMC2598138          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.016212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  30 in total

Review 1.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Age and gender related differences in children's evaluation of procedures experienced during participation in clinical research.

Authors:  Ole D Wolthers
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2004-10-02       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Research in children. A report of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP.

Authors:  Pieter J J Sauer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.

Authors:  S Folkman; R S Lazarus
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-01

5.  The anatomy of clinical-ethical judgments in perinatology and neonatology: a substantive and procedural framework.

Authors:  E D Pellegrino
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 6.  Coping theory and research: past, present, and future.

Authors:  R S Lazarus
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  S Folkman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-04

8.  Unrecognized or potential risk factors for childhood cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas A Van Larebeke; Linda S Birnbaum; Marc A Boogaerts; Marc Bracke; Devra Lee Davis; David M Demarini; Kim Hooper; James Huff; Jos C Kleinjans; Marvin S Legator; Greet Schoeters; Kirsi Vähäkangas
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun

9.  Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal models.

Authors:  L M Anderson; B A Diwan; N T Fear; E Roman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up.

Authors:  Aaron J Goldenberg; Sara Chandros Hull; Jeffrey R Botkin; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  New directions in childhood obesity research: how a comprehensive biorepository will allow better prediction of outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew A Sabin; Susan L Clemens; Richard Saffery; Zoe McCallum; Michele W Campbell; Wieland Kiess; Nancy A Crimmins; Jessica G Woo; Gary M Leong; George A Werther; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Melissa A Wake
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Clarifying assent in pediatric research.

Authors:  Noor A A Giesbertz; Annelien L Bredenoord; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Stroke genetic research and adults with impaired decision-making capacity: a survey of IRB and investigator practices.

Authors:  Donna T Chen; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott; Robert D Brown; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee.

Authors:  Arja Halkoaho; Anna-Maija Pietilä; Mari Vesalainen; Kirsi Vähäkangas
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 6.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  Participation in environmental health research by placenta donation - a perception study.

Authors:  Uffe Lind; Tina Mose; Lisbeth E Knudsen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Scientific integrity: critical issues in environmental health research.

Authors:  Domenico Franco Merlo; Kirsi Vahakangas; Lisbeth E Knudsen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Research on ethics in two large Human Biomonitoring projects ECNIS and NewGeneris: a bottom up approach.

Authors:  Birgit Dumez; Karel Van Damme; Ludwine Casteleyn
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.

Authors:  April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.