Literature DB >> 17601602

Bayesian selection of optimal rules for timing intercourse to conceive by using calendar and mucus.

Bruno Scarpa1, David B Dunson, Elena Giacchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find optimal clinical rules that maximize the probability of conception while limiting the number of intercourse days required.
DESIGN: Multicenter prospective study. Women were followed prospectively while they kept daily records of menstrual bleeding, intercourse, and mucus symptom characteristics. In some cycles, women sought to conceive, whereas in other cycles, they sought to avoid pregnancy.
SETTING: Four centers providing services on fertility awareness. PATIENT(S): One hundred ninety-one healthy women using the Billings Ovulation Method. Women were invited to enroll by their instructors if they satisfied the entry criteria. We excluded cycles in which mucus was not recorded on a day with intercourse. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinically identified pregnancies. There were 161 clinically identified pregnancies in 2,536 menstrual cycles from 191 women. RESULT(S): Our approach relies on a statistical model that relates daily predictors, such as type of mucus symptom, to the day-specific probabilities of conception. By using Bayesian methods to search over a large set of possible clinical rules, focusing on rules based on calendar and mucus, we found that simple rules that are based on days within the midcycle calendar interval that also have the most fertile-type mucus symptom present have high utility. CONCLUSION(S): Couples can shorten their time to pregnancy efficiently by timing intercourse on days that the most fertile-type mucus symptom is observed at the vulva.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17601602     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive.

Authors:  Emily Evans-Hoeker; David A Pritchard; D Leann Long; Amy H Herring; Joseph B Stanford; Anne Z Steiner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  The Use of NFP When Pregnancy Is Contraindicated?

Authors:  Justo Aznar; Julio Tudela
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-02-11

Review 3.  'Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Thijssen; A Meier; K Panis; W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2014

4.  Reclaiming fertility awareness methods to inform timed intercourse for HIV serodiscordant couples attempting to conceive.

Authors:  Caiyun Liao; Maybel Wahab; Jean Anderson; Jenell S Coleman
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.396

5.  Plausibility of Menstrual Cycle Apps Claiming to Support Conception.

Authors:  Alexander Freis; Tanja Freundl-Schütt; Lisa-Maria Wallwiener; Sigfried Baur; Thomas Strowitzki; Günter Freundl; Petra Frank-Herrmann
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  Complications related to in vitro reproductive techniques support the implementation of natural procreative technologies.

Authors:  Aysha Karim Kiani; Stefano Paolacci; Pietro Scanzano; Sandro Michelini; Natale Capodicasa; Leonardo D'Agruma; Angelantonio Notarangelo; Gerolamo Tonini; Daniela Piccinelli; Kalantary Rad Farshid; Paolo Petralia; Ezio Fulcheri; Pietro Chiurazzi; Corrado Terranova; Francesco Plotti; Roberto Angioli; Marco Castori; Matteo Bertelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-11-09

7.  A Latent Markov Model with Covariates to Study Unobserved Heterogeneity among Fertility Patterns of Couples Employing Natural Family Planning Methods.

Authors:  Fulvia Pennoni; Michele Barbato; Serena Del Zoppo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.