Literature DB >> 17599925

Different packing of external residues can explain differences in the thermostability of proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms.

Anna V Glyakina1, Sergiy O Garbuzynskiy, Michail Yu Lobanov, Oxana V Galzitskaya.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Understanding the basis of protein stability in thermophilic organisms raises a general question: what structural properties of proteins are responsible for the higher thermostability of proteins from thermophilic organisms compared to proteins from mesophilic organisms?
RESULTS: A unique database of 373 structurally well-aligned protein pairs from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms is constructed. Comparison of proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms has shown that the external, water-accessible residues of the first group are more closely packed than those of the second. Packing of interior parts of proteins (residues inaccessible to water molecules) is the same in both cases. The analysis of amino acid composition of external residues of proteins from thermophilic organisms revealed an increased fraction of such amino acids as Lys, Arg and Glu, and a decreased fraction of Ala, Asp, Asn, Gln, Thr, Ser and His. Our theoretical investigation of folding/unfolding behavior confirms the experimental observations that the interactions that differ in thermophilic and mesophilic proteins form only after the passing of the transition state during folding. Thus, different packing of external residues can explain differences in thermostability of proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms. AVAILABILITY: The database of 373 structurally well-aligned protein pairs is available at http://phys.protres.ru/resources/termo_meso_base.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599925     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  39 in total

1.  Distance-dependent statistical potentials for discriminating thermophilic and mesophilic proteins.

Authors:  Yunqi Li; Jianwen Fang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  A knowledge-based potential highlights unique features of membrane α-helical and β-barrel protein insertion and folding.

Authors:  Daniel Hsieh; Alexander Davis; Vikas Nanda
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris.

Authors:  Randy M Berka; Igor V Grigoriev; Robert Otillar; Asaf Salamov; Jane Grimwood; Ian Reid; Nadeeza Ishmael; Tricia John; Corinne Darmond; Marie-Claude Moisan; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro M Coutinho; Vincent Lombard; Donald O Natvig; Erika Lindquist; Jeremy Schmutz; Susan Lucas; Paul Harris; Justin Powlowski; Annie Bellemare; David Taylor; Gregory Butler; Ronald P de Vries; Iris E Allijn; Joost van den Brink; Sophia Ushinsky; Reginald Storms; Amy J Powell; Ian T Paulsen; Liam D H Elbourne; Scott E Baker; Jon Magnuson; Sylvie Laboissiere; A John Clutterbuck; Diego Martinez; Mark Wogulis; Alfredo Lopez de Leon; Michael W Rey; Adrian Tsang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  The Code of Silence: Widespread Associations Between Synonymous Codon Biases and Gene Function.

Authors:  Fran Supek
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Amino acid contacts in proteins adapted to different temperatures: hydrophobic interactions and surface charges play a key role.

Authors:  Gisle Saelensminde; Øyvind Halskau; Inge Jonassen
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Vibrational entropy differences between mesophile and thermophile proteins and their use in protein engineering.

Authors:  Vincent Frappier; Rafael Najmanovich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A critical review of five machine learning-based algorithms for predicting protein stability changes upon mutation.

Authors:  Jianwen Fang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  Translational selection is ubiquitous in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Fran Supek; Nives Skunca; Jelena Repar; Kristian Vlahovicek; Tomislav Smuc
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Discrimination of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Iosif I Vaisman
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-17

10.  Optimized null model for protein structure networks.

Authors:  Tijana Milenković; Ioannis Filippis; Michael Lappe; Natasa Przulj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.