| Literature DB >> 17598996 |
Ata Nevzat Yalcin1, Riza Hakan Erbay, Simay Serin, Habip Atalay, Ozlem Oner, Arzu Didem Yalcin.
Abstract
Although surgical site infections have decreased with the use of prophylactic antibiotics, inappropriate surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is still a world-wide problem. In this retrospective study, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was evaluated in a university hospital. All surgical procedures (total 2038) performed in the year 2002 were included. The study setting was the Anesthesiology and Reanimation unit in Pamukkale University Medicine Faculty Hospital. A total of 1902 patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Ninety-two percent of all procedures were elective, 8% emergencies. Approximately 85.7% were clean surgery, 8.5% clean-contaminated, 5.3% contaminated, and 0.5% dirty. Approximately 93.3% of patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Although timing of prophylaxis was appropriate in all procedures, duration was optimal in only 29.0% of all cases. Sulbactam/ampicillin (33.2%), cefepime (23.4%), ceftriaxone (15.1%), ciprofloxacin (12.6%) and cefazolin (11%) were the most commonly used antibiotics. Instead of an estimated optimal cost of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis ranging between US$2.6 and 7.8 according to guidelines, the average cost was US$62 per patient. We believe that compliance regarding the optimal choice, frequency and duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is inadequate, thereby making additional efforts necessary.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17598996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infez Med ISSN: 1124-9390