Literature DB >> 17598160

Structural learning and the hippocampus.

John P Aggleton1, David J Sanderson, John M Pearce.   

Abstract

It is argued that while the hippocampus is not vital for all classes of configural learning, it is vital for a specific subclass of configural tasks called "structural learning." The defining feature of structural learning is that in addition to binding stimulus elements to make unique arrays (as in all configural learning), the relationship of these elements to each other, be it spatial or temporal, is specified. Direct evidence supporting the proposal that the hippocampus is required for structural learning comes from recent lesion studies with rats. While rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired at relearning a set of spatial structural problems, they showed no impairment when relearning two configural tasks (transverse patterning and the biconditional discrimination), neither of which required structural learning. Other support comes from surveys of spatial and temporal learning by amnesic patients with hippocampal damage, and from imaging studies of both humans and rats. While these studies offer consistent support for the structural hypothesis, very few provide a rigorous test as the tasks can often be solved by other strategies. For this reason, the present review details the design features of future stringent tests of the structural hypothesis. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17598160     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  19 in total

1.  Physical exercise during adolescence versus adulthood: differential effects on object recognition memory and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels.

Authors:  M E Hopkins; R Nitecki; D J Bucci
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Unraveling the Role of the Hippocampus in Reversal Learning.

Authors:  Adrià Vilà-Balló; Ernest Mas-Herrero; Pablo Ripollés; Marta Simó; Júlia Miró; David Cucurell; Diana López-Barroso; Montserrat Juncadella; Josep Marco-Pallarés; Mercè Falip; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The computational nature of memory modification.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Marie-H Monfils; Kenneth A Norman; Yael Niv
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Physical exercise during pregnancy improves object recognition memory in adult offspring.

Authors:  A M Robinson; D J Bucci
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.

Authors:  Jason J Ramirez; Ruth M Colwill
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Lesions of the rat perirhinal cortex spare the acquisition of a complex configural visual discrimination yet impair object recognition.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Mathieu M Albasser; Duncan J Aggleton; Guillaume L Poirier; John M Pearce
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Hippocampus-dependent and -independent theta-networks of active maintenance.

Authors:  Nathan Cashdollar; Ulrike Malecki; Fergus J Rugg-Gunn; John S Duncan; Nilli Lavie; Emrah Duzel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Isoflurane exposure in newborn rats induces long-term cognitive dysfunction in males but not females.

Authors:  Bradley H Lee; John Thomas Chan; Ekaterina Kraeva; Katherine Peterson; Jeffrey W Sall
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Novel age-dependent learning deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: implications for translational research.

Authors:  K S Montgomery; R K Simmons; G Edwards; M M Nicolle; M A Gluck; C E Myers; J L Bizon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  The hippocampus and visual perception.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Lok-Kin Yeung; Morgan D Barense
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.