Literature DB >> 17598080

[Primary varicosis].

T Noppeney1, S Rewerk, M Winkler, H Nüllen, H C Schmedt.   

Abstract

The classic varicose vein operation still represents the "gold standard" in the operative therapy of varicose veins. The results of this procedure in view of perioperative complications are very good, with the incidence of perioperative deep venous thrombosis varying between 0.05% and 0.1%. Recurrence rates between 6% and 60% are published. However, the true recurrence rate is unknown since an exact definition of recurrent varicosis is still lacking. In recurrent varices it is essential to distinguish between disease progression, including neorevascularisation, and technical errors. Endovascular procedures for elimination of the superficial venous system - radiofrequency obliteration and endovenous laser therapy - meanwhile have established themselves as alternative, minimally invasive procedures. The perioperative complication rate of endovenous procedures is very low and comparable to that of the classic operation. Good results, with occlusion rates of the treated vein around 87% to 93% up to 2 years postoperatively, have been published for both endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency obliteration. For the latter, 5-year results were published, with occlusion of the treated vein in 87%. Results in the literature for radiofrequency are better documented than for endovenous laser treatment because there are now five prospective randomised trials for the former and most publications for endovenous laser treatment are single-center experiences. The advantage of endovenous procedures, especially radiofrequency obliteration, over the classic operation is the lower rate of perioperative pain and better quality of life. The spectrum of operative treatment methods of the superficial venous system has increased tremendously due to new technical developments. For the surgeon this implies the necessity of informing patients conscientiously about the pros and cons and available results of each procedure, and carefully weighing which methods are at the time best for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17598080     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1366-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.920


  57 in total

1.  Indications and results of endovenous laser tratment (EVLT) for greater saphenous vein incompetentce. Our experience.

Authors:  A Siani; I Flaishman; A Rossi; A Schioppa; R La Vigna; A Zaccaria
Journal:  Minerva Cardioangiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.347

2.  Varicose veins: a comparison of surgery and injection-compression sclerotherapy.

Authors:  A D Chant; H O Jones; J M Weddell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-12-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Investigation on radiofrequency and laser (980 nm) effects after endoluminal treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency in an ex-vivo model.

Authors:  C-G Schmedt; R Sroka; S Steckmeier; O A Meissner; G Babaryka; K Hunger; V Ruppert; M Sadeghi-Azandaryani; B M Steckmeier
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Lower energy endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with 980 nm diode laser in continuous mode.

Authors:  Hyun S Kim; Ikechi J Nwankwo; Kelvin Hong; Patrick S J McElgunn
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Long saphenous vein stripping and quality of life--a randomised trial.

Authors:  M T Durkin; E P Turton; L D Wijesinghe; D J Scott; D C Berridge
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  [Feasibility of ambulatory endovenous laser for the treatment of greater saphenous varicose veins: one-month outcome in a series of 20 outpatients].

Authors:  J L Gérard; P Desgranges; J P Becquemin; H Desse; D Mellière
Journal:  J Mal Vasc       Date:  2002-10

7.  Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Lurie; D Creton; B Eklof; L S Kabnick; R L Kistner; O Pichot; C Sessa; S Schuller-Petrovic
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  [Results of standard varicose vein surgery].

Authors:  T Noppeney; J Noppeney; I Kurth
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.942

9.  Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein.

Authors:  P H Rutgers; P J Kitslaar
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Endovenous laser surgery of the incompetent greater saphenous vein with a 980-nm diode laser.

Authors:  Chang-Keun Oh; Do-Sang Jung; Ho-Sun Jang; Kyung-Sool Kwon
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.398

View more
  1 in total

1.  Study on the Long-Term Results of Endovenous Laser Ablation for Treating Varicose Veins.

Authors:  Seung Je Go; Byung Sun Cho; Yun Su Mun; Yoon Jung Kang; Hye Young Ahn
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-07-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.