PURPOSE: It is believed spot reduction, the exercise-induced localized loss of subcutaneous fat, does not occur as a result of an exercise program; however, evidence as a whole has been inconsistent. To reexamine this concept, we compared subcutaneous fat measurements before and after resistance training among 104 subjects (45 men, 59 women). METHODS: Subjects participated in 12 wk of supervised resistance training of their nondominant arm. Magnetic resonance imaging and skinfold calipers examined subcutaneous fat in the nondominant (trained) and dominant (untrained) arms before and after resistance training. Repeated-measures ANCOVA tested for subcutaneous fat differences within and between arms before, after, and from before to after resistance training by gender and measurement technique, with BMI and age as covariates. Simple linear regression compared subcutaneous fat changes before and after resistance training as assessed by MRI and skinfold. RESULTS: Subcutaneous fat, measured by skinfold, decreased in the trained arm and not the untrained arm in the men (P < 0.01); it was similar in the total sample and in the women (P > 0.05). MRI determinations of subcutaneous fat changes were not different between arms in the total sample and by gender (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous fat changes resulting from resistance training varied by gender and assessment technique. Skinfold findings indicate that spot reduction occurred in men but not in women. In contrast, MRI found a generalized subcutaneous fat loss independent of gender, supporting the notion that spot reduction does not occur as a result of resistance training. MRI, sensitive to changes along the entire upper arm, detected greater variation in resistance training responses, preventing significant differences between trained and untrained arms. Variation in upper-arm resistance training response was not evident from a single skinfold measurement at the belly of the muscle.
PURPOSE: It is believed spot reduction, the exercise-induced localized loss of subcutaneous fat, does not occur as a result of an exercise program; however, evidence as a whole has been inconsistent. To reexamine this concept, we compared subcutaneous fat measurements before and after resistance training among 104 subjects (45 men, 59 women). METHODS: Subjects participated in 12 wk of supervised resistance training of their nondominant arm. Magnetic resonance imaging and skinfold calipers examined subcutaneous fat in the nondominant (trained) and dominant (untrained) arms before and after resistance training. Repeated-measures ANCOVA tested for subcutaneous fat differences within and between arms before, after, and from before to after resistance training by gender and measurement technique, with BMI and age as covariates. Simple linear regression compared subcutaneous fat changes before and after resistance training as assessed by MRI and skinfold. RESULTS: Subcutaneous fat, measured by skinfold, decreased in the trained arm and not the untrained arm in the men (P < 0.01); it was similar in the total sample and in the women (P > 0.05). MRI determinations of subcutaneous fat changes were not different between arms in the total sample and by gender (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous fat changes resulting from resistance training varied by gender and assessment technique. Skinfold findings indicate that spot reduction occurred in men but not in women. In contrast, MRI found a generalized subcutaneous fat loss independent of gender, supporting the notion that spot reduction does not occur as a result of resistance training. MRI, sensitive to changes along the entire upper arm, detected greater variation in resistance training responses, preventing significant differences between trained and untrained arms. Variation in upper-arm resistance training response was not evident from a single skinfold measurement at the belly of the muscle.
Authors: S Walsh; C J Haddad; M A Kostek; T J Angelopoulos; P M Clarkson; P M Gordon; N M Moyna; P S Visich; R F Zoeller; R L Seip; S Bilbie; P D Thompson; J Devaney; H Gordish-Dressman; E P Hoffman; Thomas B Price; L S Pescatello Journal: Gene Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Cory T Walts; Erik D Hanson; Matthew J Delmonico; Lili Yao; Min Qi Wang; Ben F Hurley Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Erik D Hanson; Sindhu R Srivatsan; Siddhartha Agrawal; Kalapurakkal S Menon; Matthew J Delmonico; Min Q Wang; Ben F Hurley Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Funda E Orkunoglu-Suer; Brennan T Harmon; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Priscilla M Clarkson; Paul D Thompson; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Paul M Gordon; Monica J Hubal; Niall M Moyna; Linda S Pescatello; Paul S Visich; Robert F Zoeller; Eric P Hoffman; Joseph M Devaney Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Michael Bruneau; Sean Walsh; Eric Selinsky; Garrett Ash; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Priscilla Clarkson; Paul Gordon; Niall Moyna; Paul Visich; Robert Zoeller; Paul Thompson; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Eric Hoffman; Joseph Devaney; Linda S Pescatello Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Joaquín Sanchis-Moysi; José Antonio Serrano-Sánchez; Juan José González-Henríquez; José A L Calbet; Cecilia Dorado Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Antonio Paoli; Andrea Casolo; Matteo Saoncella; Carlo Bertaggia; Marco Fantin; Antonino Bianco; Giuseppe Marcolin; Tatiana Moro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Funda E Orkunoglu-Suer; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Priscilla M Clarkson; Paul D Thompson; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Paul M Gordon; Niall M Moyna; Linda S Pescatello; Paul S Visich; Robert F Zoeller; Brennan Harmon; Richard L Seip; Eric P Hoffman; Joseph M Devaney Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 2.103