M Righini1, M Nendaz, G Le Gal, H Bounameaux, A Perrier. 1. Division of Angiology and Haemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. marc.righini@hcuge.ch
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Age has a marked effect on the diagnostic yield of D-dimer measurement and lower limb compression ultrasonography (CUS) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), suggesting that specific diagnostic strategies may be needed in elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of including D-dimer and CUS in the workup of PE, with particular attention to patient age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from two recent outcome studies that enrolled 1721 consecutive outpatients with suspected PE. Both studies used a sequential diagnostic strategy that included assessment of clinical probability, D-dimer measurement, CUS, and helical computed tomography (hCT). A decision analysis model was created for analyzing cost-effectiveness according to six classes of age. The main outcome measures were 3-month quality-adjusted expected survival and costs per patient managed. RESULTS: All strategies were equally safe, with variations in the 3-month survival never exceeding 0.5% as compared to the most effective strategy. D-dimer measurement was highly cost-saving under the age of 80 years. Above 80 years, the cost-sparing effect of D-dimer was diminished, but not completely abolished. Inclusion of CUS increased the costs of diagnostic strategies irrespective of age. Results were unchanged over a wide range of the variables of interest (costs, sensitivity, and specificity of the tests). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic strategies using D-dimer are less expensive. The cost-sparing effect of D-dimer is reduced but not abolished above 80 years, suggesting that adapting specific diagnostic strategies in elderly outpatients is not mandatory. CUS is costly, and only marginally improves the safety of diagnostic strategies for PE.
BACKGROUND: Age has a marked effect on the diagnostic yield of D-dimer measurement and lower limb compression ultrasonography (CUS) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), suggesting that specific diagnostic strategies may be needed in elderly patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of including D-dimer and CUS in the workup of PE, with particular attention to patient age. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from two recent outcome studies that enrolled 1721 consecutive outpatients with suspected PE. Both studies used a sequential diagnostic strategy that included assessment of clinical probability, D-dimer measurement, CUS, and helical computed tomography (hCT). A decision analysis model was created for analyzing cost-effectiveness according to six classes of age. The main outcome measures were 3-month quality-adjusted expected survival and costs per patient managed. RESULTS: All strategies were equally safe, with variations in the 3-month survival never exceeding 0.5% as compared to the most effective strategy. D-dimer measurement was highly cost-saving under the age of 80 years. Above 80 years, the cost-sparing effect of D-dimer was diminished, but not completely abolished. Inclusion of CUS increased the costs of diagnostic strategies irrespective of age. Results were unchanged over a wide range of the variables of interest (costs, sensitivity, and specificity of the tests). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic strategies using D-dimer are less expensive. The cost-sparing effect of D-dimer is reduced but not abolished above 80 years, suggesting that adapting specific diagnostic strategies in elderly outpatients is not mandatory. CUS is costly, and only marginally improves the safety of diagnostic strategies for PE.
Authors: Christopher Kabrhel; D Mark Courtney; Carlos A Camargo; Michael C Plewa; Kristen E Nordenholz; Christopher L Moore; Peter B Richman; Howard A Smithline; Daren M Beam; Jeffrey A Kline Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Renée A Douma; Melanie Tan; Roger E G Schutgens; Shannon M Bates; Arnaud Perrier; Cristina Legnani; Douwe H Biesma; Jeffrey S Ginsberg; Henri Bounameaux; Gualtiero Palareti; Marc Carrier; Gerben C Mol; Grégoire Le Gal; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Marc Righini Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Robert W Teasell; Jane T Hsieh; Jo-Anne L Aubut; Janice J Eng; Andrei Krassioukov; Linh Tu Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Renée A Douma; Grégoire le Gal; Maaike Söhne; Marc Righini; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Arnaud Perrier; Marieke J H A Kruip; Henri Bounameaux; Harry R Büller; Pierre-Marie Roy Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-03-30
Authors: Christopher Parks; Richard Bounds; Barbara Davis; Richard Caplan; Tom Laughery; Eli Zeserson Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Julio Flores; Jaime García de Tena; Javier Galipienzo; Ángel García-Avello; Esteban Pérez-Rodríguez; José Ignacio Tortuero; Concepción Álvarez; Antonio Ruíz; Ignacio Arribas Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Henrike J Schouten; G J Geersing; H L Koek; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Kristel J M Janssen; Renée A Douma; Johannes J M van Delden; Karel G M Moons; Johannes B Reitsma Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-05-03