Literature DB >> 17595406

The Theory of Genetic Vulnerability: a Roy model exemplar.

Rebekah J Hamilton1, Barbara J Bowers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of adult genetic testing. Grounded theory was used to plan, guide, and analyze in-depth interviews with 29 participants. The theory of genetic vulnerability was developed and is composed of five concepts: (a) experiencing the family disease, (b) testing for a mutation, (c) fore-grounding inherited disease risk, (d) responding to knowledge of genetic vulnerability, and (e) altering or avoiding the family experience of inherited disease. Roy's model of adaptation is discussed as a valuable lens through which to test and adapt this theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17595406     DOI: 10.1177/0894318407303127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Sci Q        ISSN: 0894-3184            Impact factor:   0.883


  14 in total

1.  Grounded theory in genetic counseling research: an interpretive perspective.

Authors:  Robin E Grubs; Maria Piantanida
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Family Communication, Risk Perception and Cancer Knowledge of Young Adults from BRCA1/2 Families: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alison L Young; Phyllis N Butow; Janine Vetsch; Veronica F Quinn; Andrea F Patenaude; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Information and support needs of young women regarding breast cancer risk and genetic testing: adapting effective interventions for a novel population.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Chalanda Evans; Rebekah J Hamilton; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Sue Friedman; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Relationship between individual and family characteristics and psychosocial factors in persons with familial pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Meghan Underhill; Fangxin Hong; Janette Lawrence; Traci Blonquist; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Explanations of risk in families without identified mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anne L Ersig; Lioness Ayres; Donald W Hadley; Laura M Koehly
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  "Grasping the grey": patient understanding and interpretation of an intermediate allele predictive test result for Huntington disease.

Authors:  A Semaka; L G Balneaves; M R Hayden
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Living With Genetic Vulnerability: a Life Course Perspective.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Nancy A Innella; Dawn T Bounds
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Nursing advocacy in a postgenomic age.

Authors:  Rebekah Hamilton
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.208

9.  The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Heather A Douglas; Rebekah J Hamilton; Robin E Grubs
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Genetics: breast cancer as an exemplar.

Authors:  Rebekah Hamilton
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.