Literature DB >> 17595161

Helix 8 Leu in the CB1 cannabinoid receptor contributes to selective signal transduction mechanisms.

Sharon Anavi-Goffer1, Daniel Fleischer, Dow P Hurst, Diane L Lynch, Judy Barnett-Norris, Shanping Shi, Deborah L Lewis, Somnath Mukhopadhyay, Allyn C Howlett, Patricia H Reggio, Mary E Abood.   

Abstract

The intracellular C-terminal helix 8 (H8) of the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor deviates from the highly conserved NPXXY(X)(5,6)F G-protein-coupled receptor motif, possessing a Leu instead of a Phe. We compared the signal transduction capabilities of CB(1) with those of an L7.60F mutation and an L7.60I mutation that mimics the CB(2) sequence. The two mutant receptors differed from wild type (WT) in their ability to regulate G-proteins in the [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assay. The L7.60F receptor exhibited attenuated stimulation by agonists WIN-55,212-2 and CP-55,940 but not HU-210, whereas the L7.60I receptor exhibited impaired stimulation by all agonists tested as well as by the inverse agonist rimonabant. The mutants internalized more rapidly than WT receptors but could equally sequester G-proteins from the somatostatin receptor. Both the time course and maximal N-type Ca(2+) current inhibition by WIN-55,212-2 were reduced in the mutants. Reconstitution experiments with pertussis toxin-insensitive G-proteins revealed loss of coupling to Galpha(i3) but not Galpha(0A) in the L7.60I mutant, whereas the reduction in the time course for the L7.60F mutant was governed by Galpha(i3). Furthermore, Galpha(i3) but not Galpha(0A) enhanced basal facilitation ratio, suggesting that Galpha(i3) is responsible for CB(1) tonic activity. Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed that both mutant receptors were associated with Galpha(i1) or Galpha(i2) but not with Galpha(i3). Molecular dynamics simulations of WT CB(1) receptor and each mutant in a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer suggested that the packing of H8 is different in each. The hydrogen bonding patterns along the helix backbones of each H8 also are different, as are the geometries of the elbow region of H8 (R7.56(400)-K7.58(402)). This study demonstrates that the evolutionary modification to NPXXY(X)(5,6)L contributes to maximal activity of the CB(1) receptor and provides a molecular basis for the differential coupling observed with chemically different agonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17595161     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M703388200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  26 in total

1.  Structural determinants in the second intracellular loop of the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor mediate selective coupling to G(s) and G(i).

Authors:  X P Chen; W Yang; Y Fan; J S Luo; K Hong; Z Wang; J F Yan; X Chen; J X Lu; J L Benovic; N M Zhou
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard S Bedlack; Nanette Joyce; Gregory T Carter; Sabrina Paganoni; Chafic Karam
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Hydrophobic residues in helix 8 of cannabinoid receptor 1 are critical for structural and functional properties.

Authors:  Kwang H Ahn; Akiko Nishiyama; Dale F Mierke; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  CB(1) receptor allosteric modulators display both agonist and signaling pathway specificity.

Authors:  Gemma L Baillie; James G Horswill; Sharon Anavi-Goffer; Patricia H Reggio; Daniele Bolognini; Mary E Abood; Sean McAllister; Phillip G Strange; Gary J Stephens; Roger G Pertwee; Ruth A Ross
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  A role for L-alpha-lysophosphatidylinositol and GPR55 in the modulation of migration, orientation and polarization of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Lesley A Ford; Anke J Roelofs; Sharon Anavi-Goffer; Luisa Mowat; Daniel G Simpson; Andrew J Irving; Michael J Rogers; Ann M Rajnicek; Ruth A Ross
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Structural and dynamic effects of cholesterol at preferred sites of interaction with rhodopsin identified from microsecond length molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  George Khelashvili; Alan Grossfield; Scott E Feller; Michael C Pitman; Harel Weinstein
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-08-01

7.  Predicting the molecular interactions of CRIP1a-cannabinoid 1 receptor with integrated molecular modeling approaches.

Authors:  Mostafa H Ahmed; Glen E Kellogg; Dana E Selley; Martin K Safo; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Structural analysis of the human cannabinoid receptor one carboxyl-terminus identifies two amphipathic helices.

Authors:  Kwang H Ahn; Maria Pellegrini; Natia Tsomaia; Achani K Yatawara; Debra A Kendall; Dale F Mierke
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  NMR solution structure of human cannabinoid receptor-1 helix 7/8 peptide: candidate electrostatic interactions and microdomain formation.

Authors:  Sergiy Tyukhtenko; Elvis K Tiburu; Lalit Deshmukh; Olga Vinogradova; David R Janero; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Transmembrane helical domain of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor.

Authors:  Joong-Youn Shim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.