Steven J Durning1, Paul Hemmer, Louis N Pangaro. 1. Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA. sdurning@usuhs.mil
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Directors of courses, clerkships, residencies, and fellowships are responsible not only for determining whether individual trainees have met educational goals but also for ensuring the quality of the training program itself. The purpose of this article is to discuss a framework for program evaluation that has sufficient rigor to satisfy accreditation requirements yet is flexible and responsive to the uniqueness of individual educational programs. SUMMARY: We discuss key aspects of program evaluation to include cardinal definitions, measurements, needed resources, and analyses of qualitative and quantitative data. We propose a three-phase framework for data collection (Before, During, and After) that can be used across undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education. CONCLUSIONS: This Before, During, and After model is a feasible and practical approach that is sufficiently rigorous to allow for conclusions that can lead to action. It can be readily implemented for new and existing medical education programs.
BACKGROUND: Directors of courses, clerkships, residencies, and fellowships are responsible not only for determining whether individual trainees have met educational goals but also for ensuring the quality of the training program itself. The purpose of this article is to discuss a framework for program evaluation that has sufficient rigor to satisfy accreditation requirements yet is flexible and responsive to the uniqueness of individual educational programs. SUMMARY: We discuss key aspects of program evaluation to include cardinal definitions, measurements, needed resources, and analyses of qualitative and quantitative data. We propose a three-phase framework for data collection (Before, During, and After) that can be used across undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education. CONCLUSIONS: This Before, During, and After model is a feasible and practical approach that is sufficiently rigorous to allow for conclusions that can lead to action. It can be readily implemented for new and existing medical education programs.
Authors: Shera Hosseini; Yusuf Yilmaz; Kaushal Shah; Michael Gottlieb; Christine R Stehman; Andrew K Hall; Teresa M Chan Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Shikhar H Shah; Maureen D Clark; Kimberly Hu; Jalene A Shoener; Joshua Fogel; William C Kling; James Ronayne Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2017-10-17
Authors: Brent Thoma; Michael Gottlieb; Megan Boysen-Osborn; Andrew King; Antonia Quinn; Sara Krzyzaniak; Nicolas Pineda; Lalena M Yarris; Teresa Chan Journal: Cureus Date: 2017-05-04
Authors: John W Ragsdale; Andrea Berry; Jennifer W Gibson; Christiane R Herber-Valdez; Lauren J Germain; Deborah L Engle Journal: Med Educ Online Date: 2020-12
Authors: Asale Hubbard; Andrew Sudler; Jean-Marie E Alves-Bradford; Nhi-Ha Trinh; Anne D Emmerich; Christina Mangurian Journal: Psychiatr Clin North Am Date: 2022-05-14