| Literature DB >> 35783081 |
Shera Hosseini1, Yusuf Yilmaz2,3, Kaushal Shah4, Michael Gottlieb5, Christine R Stehman6, Andrew K Hall7,8, Teresa M Chan9,10,11,12.
Abstract
Program evaluation is an "essential responsibility" but is often not seen as a scholarly pursuit. While Boyer expanded what qualifies as educational scholarship, many still need to engage in processes that are rigorous and of a requisite academic standard to be labelled as scholarly. Many medical educators may feel that scholarly program evaluation is a daunting task due to the competing interests of curricular change, remediation, and clinical care. This paper explores how educators can take their questions around outcomes and efficacy of our programs and efficiently engage in education scholarship. The authors outline how educators can examine whether training programs have a desired impact and outcomes, and then how they might leverage this process into education scholarship.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783081 PMCID: PMC9222891 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10745
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AEM Educ Train ISSN: 2472-5390