Literature DB >> 17592770

Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses' Health Study.

Goli Samimi1, Graham A Colditz, Heather J Baer, Rulla M Tamimi.   

Abstract

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer; however the mechanism that underlies this association is unclear. We hypothesized that measures of energy balance early in life and in adulthood may be associated with mammographic density. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,398 women in the Nurses' Health Study to examine associations between physical activity, childhood and current body fatness, weight gain from age 18 years to present and mammographic density. Percent mammographic density was measured from digitized mammograms by a computer-assisted method. Demographic and lifestyle data were obtained from prospectively collected questionnaires. For all analyses, subjects were stratified into three groups: premenopausal women, postmenopausal women not currently taking hormones, and postmenopausal women currently taking hormones. Childhood body fatness was inversely associated with mammographic density. The correlations ranged from -0.15 to -0.19 in the three strata of women (P<or=0.001). The difference in mean percent mammographic density between the leanest and heaviest body types ranged from 6.2 to 9.9%. Similarly, adult body fatness was inversely associated with percent mammographic density. The correlations ranged from -0.41 to -0.48 in the three strata of women (P<0.0001). The difference in mean percent mammographic density between the leanest and heaviest body types ranged from 22.3 to 35.1%. Weight gain from age 18 was also inversely associated with mammographic density. There was no association between recent physical activity and mammographic density. These findings indicate that childhood and adult body fatness and weight change from age 18 are inversely associated with mammographic density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592770     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9631-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  39 in total

1.  Adolescent physical activity in relation to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Caroline E Boeke; A Heather Eliassen; Hannah Oh; Donna Spiegelman; Walter C Willett; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Mammographic density change with 1 year of aerobic exercise among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Christy G Woolcott; Kerry S Courneya; Norman F Boyd; Martin J Yaffe; Tim Terry; Anne McTiernan; Rollin Brant; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Melinda L Irwin; Charlotte A Jones; Sony Brar; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Kristina H Karvinen; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and mammographic density.

Authors:  William C Strohsnitter; Kimberly A Bertrand; Rebecca Troisi; Christopher G Scott; Andrea L Cheville; Robert N Hoover; Julie R Palmer; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Breast cancer risk prediction: an update to the Rosner-Colditz breast cancer incidence model.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Walter C Willett; Graham Colditz; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: effect modification by body mass through life.

Authors:  Marie Søfteland Sandvei; Lars J Vatten; Elisabeth Krefting Bjelland; Anne Eskild; Solveig Hofvind; Giske Ursin; Signe Opdahl
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Prospective evaluation of body size and breast cancer risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Shana J Kim; Tomasz Huzarski; Jacek Gronwald; Christian F Singer; Pål Møller; Henry T Lynch; Susan Armel; Beth Y Karlan; William D Foulkes; Susan L Neuhausen; Leigha Senter; Andrea Eisen; Charis Eng; Seema Panchal; Tuya Pal; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Dana Zakalik; Jan Lubinski; Steven A Narod; Joanne Kotsopoulos
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Early Life Body Fatness, Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone, and Breast Density in Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; Heather J Baer; E John Orav; Catherine Klifa; Ajay Kumar; Nola M Hylton; Erin S LeBlanc; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Maternal Anthropometry and Mammographic Density in Adult Daughters.

Authors:  Karin B Michels; Barbara A Cohn; Mandy Goldberg; Julie D Flom; Marcelle Dougan; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Effects of childhood body size on breast cancer tumour characteristics.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.