Literature DB >> 17592045

Differential factor requirement to assemble translation initiation complexes at the alternative start codons of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA.

Dmitri E Andreev1, Olga Fernandez-Miragall, Jorge Ramajo, Sergey E Dmitriev, Ilya M Terenin, Encarna Martinez-Salas, Ivan N Shatsky.   

Abstract

The foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) RNA contains two in-frame AUG codons separated by 84 nt that direct translation initiation of the viral polyprotein. The mechanism of initiation at the IRES-proximal AUG codon (AUG1) has been previously analyzed, whereas no data on factor requirements for AUG2 have been reported. Here, using the method of 48S translation initiation complex reconstitution, we show that eIF1 is indispensable in forming the 48S initiation complex at AUG2. In contrast, it reduces the assembly of this complex at AUG1. Stabilization of a stem-loop between the initiation triplets induces a small decrease in the toeprint intensity at AUG2, accompanied by an increase in the AUG1/AUG2 ratio as well as a moderate reduction of protein synthesis initiated at AUG2 in transfected cells. PTB and ITAF45 exerted an additive positive effect on the 48S complex at AUG2, although a substantial reconstitution on both AUGs occurs on omission of either of these proteins. Relative to the beta-globin mRNA, the 48S complex formation at AUG1 and AUG2 is slow and occurs with the same kinetics as revealed by the "kinetic" toeprint assay. Mutation of AUG1 to AUA does not abrogate protein synthesis in transfected cells, and has no effect on the rate of the 48S complex formation at AUG2. We conclude that the AUG2 initiation region is selected independently of 48S complex formation at the upstream AUG1. The kinetic toeprint assay also shows that cap-dependent assembly of the 48S complex in vitro occurs faster than the FMDV IRES-mediated complex assembly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592045      PMCID: PMC1924898          DOI: 10.1261/rna.469707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  28 in total

Review 1.  Functional interactions in internal translation initiation directed by viral and cellular IRES elements.

Authors:  Encarnación Martínez-Salas; Ricardo Ramos; Esther Lafuente; Sonia López de Quinto
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.891

2.  A cell cycle-dependent protein serves as a template-specific translation initiation factor.

Authors:  E V Pilipenko; T V Pestova; V G Kolupaeva; E V Khitrina; A N Poperechnaya; V I Agol; C U Hellen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Hepatitis C virus-related internal ribosome entry sites are found in multiple genera of the family Picornaviridae.

Authors:  Louisa S Chard; Marie-Eve Bordeleau; Jerry Pelletier; Junichi Tanaka; Graham J Belsham
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of translation initiation in eukaryotes.

Authors:  T V Pestova; V G Kolupaeva; I B Lomakin; E V Pilipenko; I N Shatsky; V I Agol; C U Hellen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection.

Authors:  Tatyana V Pestova; Victoria G Kolupaeva
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  IRES interaction with translation initiation factors: functional characterization of novel RNA contacts with eIF3, eIF4B, and eIF4GII.

Authors:  S López de Quinto; E Lafuente; E Martínez-Salas
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Transient expression of cellular polypyrimidine-tract binding protein stimulates cap-independent translation directed by both picornaviral and flaviviral internal ribosome entry sites In vivo.

Authors:  R Gosert; K H Chang; R Rijnbrand; M Yi; D V Sangar; S M Lemon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Interaction of the eIF4G initiation factor with the aphthovirus IRES is essential for internal translation initiation in vivo.

Authors:  S López de Quinto; E Martínez-Salas
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Unr is required in vivo for efficient initiation of translation from the internal ribosome entry sites of both rhinovirus and poliovirus.

Authors:  Oréda Boussadia; Michael Niepmann; Laurent Créancier; Anne-Catherine Prats; François Dautry; Hélène Jacquemin-Sablon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Conversion of 48S translation preinitiation complexes into 80S initiation complexes as revealed by toeprinting.

Authors:  Sergey E Dmitriev; Andrey V Pisarev; Maria P Rubtsova; Yan E Dunaevsky; Ivan N Shatsky
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 4.124

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Translation initiation: variations in the mechanism can be anticipated.

Authors:  Naglis Malys; John E G McCarthy
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  The bacterial toxin RelE induces specific mRNA cleavage in the A site of the eukaryote ribosome.

Authors:  Dmitri Andreev; Vasili Hauryliuk; Ilya Terenin; Sergey Dmitriev; Måns Ehrenberg; Ivan Shatsky
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Mechanisms governing the selection of translation initiation sites on foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA.

Authors:  Tuija A A Pöyry; Richard J Jackson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Tailoring the switch from IRES-dependent to 5'-end-dependent translation with the RNase P ribozyme.

Authors:  Noemi Fernández; Encarnación Martínez-Salas
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 5.  Noncanonical Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Thaddaeus Kwan; Sunnie R Thompson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  The mechanism of translation initiation on Type 1 picornavirus IRESs.

Authors:  Trevor R Sweeney; Irina S Abaeva; Tatyana V Pestova; Christopher U T Hellen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Host factors in enterovirus 71 replication.

Authors:  Shin-Ru Shih; Victor Stollar; Mei-Ling Li
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 8.  A new framework for understanding IRES-mediated translation.

Authors:  Anton A Komar; Barsanjit Mazumder; William C Merrick
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 9.  Insights into the biology of IRES elements through riboproteomic approaches.

Authors:  Almudena Pacheco; Encarnacion Martinez-Salas
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-02

10.  A new type of IRES within gag coding region recruits three initiation complexes on HIV-2 genomic RNA.

Authors:  Laure Weill; Laurie James; Nathalie Ulryck; Nathalie Chamond; Cecile H Herbreteau; Theophile Ohlmann; Bruno Sargueil
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.