Literature DB >> 17591932

Amplification patterns of three genomic regions predict distant recurrence in breast carcinoma.

Lisa M Davis1, Cole Harris, Lei Tang, Patti Doherty, Peter Hraber, Yumiko Sakai, Therese Bocklage, Katie Doeden, Bryan Hall, John Alsobrook, Ian Rabinowitz, Thomas M Williams, John Hozier.   

Abstract

Currently used clinical and histopathological parameters imprecisely define the risk of distant recurrence in breast cancer, underscoring the need for more informative prognostic markers. In the present fluorescence in situ hybridization study of archived surgical specimens, we derived an algorithm for computing a prognostic index (PI) from DNA copy numbers of three genomic regions (CYP24, PDCD6IP, and BIRC5) for estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive (ER/PR+) cancers and a distinct PI (based on NR1D1, SMARCE1, and BIRC5) for estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative (ER/PR-) cancers. Among independent test cases stratified by PI, recurrence rates were significantly higher among high-risk patients than low-risk patients for both ER/PR+ (odds ratio = 9.52, 95% confidence interval >2.12, P = 0.0024) and ER/PR- (odds ratio = 12.3, 95% confidence interval >1.45, P = 0.0188) cancers. Among the entire population, recurrences were significantly more prevalent for cases with PI above the medians for both ER/PR+ (Fisher's exact, P = 1.19 x 10(-5)) and ER/PR- (P = 0.0025) patients and for the node-negative subsets (ER/PR+ node-negative, P = 0.042 and ER/PR- node-negative, P = 0.039). In conclusion, these markers perform well in comparison with other criteria for recurrence risk assessment and can be used with routinely formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded surgical specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17591932      PMCID: PMC1899419          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  33 in total

1.  A model for evaluation of in situ hybridization spot-count distributions in tissue sections.

Authors:  M M Pahlplatz; P C de Wilde; P Poddighe; H van Dekken; G P Vooijs; A G Hanselaar
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1995-07-01

2.  A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.

Authors:  A P Feinberg; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1983-07-01       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies.

Authors:  Koei Chin; Sandy DeVries; Jane Fridlyand; Paul T Spellman; Ritu Roydasgupta; Wen-Lin Kuo; Anna Lapuk; Richard M Neve; Zuwei Qian; Tom Ryder; Fanqing Chen; Heidi Feiler; Taku Tokuyasu; Chris Kingsley; Shanaz Dairkee; Zhenhang Meng; Karen Chew; Daniel Pinkel; Ajay Jain; Britt Marie Ljung; Laura Esserman; Donna G Albertson; Frederic M Waldman; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Mapping of DNA amplifications at 15 chromosomal localizations in 1875 breast tumors: definition of phenotypic groups.

Authors:  F Courjal; M Cuny; J Simony-Lafontaine; G Louason; P Speiser; R Zeillinger; C Rodriguez; C Theillet
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Aron Goldhirsch; William C Wood; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates; Beat Thürlimann; Hans-Jörg Senn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.

Authors:  A Kallioniemi; O P Kallioniemi; D Sudar; D Rutovitz; J W Gray; F Waldman; D Pinkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Gene expression profiling detects gene amplification and differentiates tumor types in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marlene A Dressman; Alex Baras; Rachel Malinowski; Lisa B Alvis; Irene Kwon; Thomas M Walz; Mihael H Polymeropoulos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  A two-gene expression ratio predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Ma; Zuncai Wang; Paula D Ryan; Steven J Isakoff; Anne Barmettler; Andrew Fuller; Beth Muir; Gayatry Mohapatra; Ranelle Salunga; J Todd Tuggle; Yen Tran; Diem Tran; Ana Tassin; Paul Amon; Wilson Wang; Wei Wang; Edward Enright; Kimberly Stecker; Eden Estepa-Sabal; Barbara Smith; Jerry Younger; Ulysses Balis; James Michaelson; Atul Bhan; Karleen Habin; Thomas M Baer; Joan Brugge; Daniel A Haber; Mark G Erlander; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  The c-erbB-2 proto-oncogene as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer: a paradigm for the development of other macromolecular markers--a review.

Authors:  P M Ravdin; G C Chamness
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-06-14       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 10.  Survivin apoptosis: an interloper between cell death and cell proliferation in cancer.

Authors:  D C Altieri; P C Marchisio; C Marchisio
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.662

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Orphan nuclear receptors in breast cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Rebecca B Riggins; Mary M Mazzotta; Omar Z Maniya; Robert Clarke
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 2.  Circadian gene variants in cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Kettner; Chinenye A Katchy; Loning Fu
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Predictive and prognostic molecular markers for cancer medicine.

Authors:  Sunali Mehta; Andrew Shelling; Anita Muthukaruppan; Annette Lasham; Cherie Blenkiron; George Laking; Cristin Print
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 4.  Minireview: role of orphan nuclear receptors in cancer and potential as drug targets.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Un-Ho Jin; Erik Hedrick; Alexandra Reeder; Syng-Ook Lee
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-12-02

5.  Oncogene amplification in male breast cancer: analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Robert Kornegoor; Cathy B Moelans; Anoek H J Verschuur-Maes; Marieke C H Hogenes; Peter C de Bruin; Joost J Oudejans; Luigi Marchionni; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Molecular differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and adjacent invasive breast carcinoma: a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Roel A de Wegers; Hanneke N Monsuurs; Anoek H J Maess; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.730

7.  SMARCE1 regulates metastatic potential of breast cancer cells through the HIF1A/PTK2 pathway.

Authors:  Aarti Sethuraman; Martin Brown; Tiffany N Seagroves; Zhao-Hui Wu; Lawrence M Pfeffer; Meiyun Fan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Profiling of gene expression regulated by 17β-estradiol and tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-negative human breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Nelson Rangel; Victoria E Villegas; Milena Rondón-Lagos
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-09-20

9.  High expression of NR1D1 is associated with good prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hyelin Na; Jinil Han; Na-Lee Ka; Min-Ho Lee; Yoon-La Choi; Young Kee Shin; Mi-Ock Lee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Relationship between estrogen receptor alpha location and gene induction reveals the importance of downstream sites and cofactors.

Authors:  Fabio Parisi; Bernhard Sonderegger; Pratyaksha Wirapati; Mauro Delorenzi; Felix Naef
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.