Literature DB >> 17591711

Effect of feeding fermented liquid feed and fermented grain on gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance in piglets.

N Canibe1, O Højberg, J H Badsberg, B B Jensen.   

Abstract

To investigate the microbial and nutritional characteristics of dry feed, liquid feed containing fermented liquid cereal grains, and fermented liquid feed, and their effect on gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance, 120 piglets from 40 litters were used and housed in pens with 5 animals in each. The 3 dietary treatments (all nonheated and nonpelleted diets) were: a dry meal diet (DRY); a fermented, liquid cereal grain feed (FLG); and a fermented liquid feed (FLF). The FLG diet was prepared by storing the dietary cereals (barley and wheat) and water (1:2.5, wt/wt) in a closed tank at 20 degrees C and adding the remaining dietary ingredients immediately before feeding. The FLF diet was prepared by storing compound feed and water (1:2.5, wt/wt) in a closed tank at 20 degrees C. Three times daily, 50% of the fermented cereals or compound feed and water stored in the tanks was removed and replaced with an equal amount of fresh cereals or feed and water. On d 14, 1 piglet from each pen was killed and samples from the gastrointestinal tract were obtained. The pH of the fermented cereals was 3.85 (SD = 0.10), that of the FLG diet was 5.00 (SD = 0.18), and the pH of the FLF diet was 4.45 (SD = 0.11). The dietary concentration of lysine (g/16 g of N) pointed to a decreased concentration in the FLF (5.46, SD = 0.08) compared with the DRY (6.01) and FLG (6.21, SD = 0.27) diets, and the concentration of cadaverine was greater in the FLF diet (890 mg/kg, SD = 151.3) than in the DRY (32 mg/kg) or FLG (153 mg/kg, SD = 18.7) diets. Fermenting only the cereal component of the diet (FLG) promoted the growth of yeasts to a greater extent than fermenting the whole diet (FLF). Terminal RFLP profiles of diets and digesta from the stomach and midcolon showed differences among dietary groups. The number of yeasts able to grow at 37 degrees C in the stomach and caudal small intestine was greatest in the FLG group compared with the other 2 dietary groups (P < 0.01). In the cecum and colon, the differences were only significant between piglets fed the FLG and the FLF diets (P < 0.05). The greatest number of yeasts able to grow at 20 degrees C was detected in the animals fed the FLG diet. However, the values were different from the FLF-fed piglets only in the stomach (P < 0.05) and midcolon (P < 0.05). There was a tendency (P < 0.10) for greater ADG of the piglets fed the FLG compared with the FLF diet. Feeding liquid feed containing fermented, liquid cereal grains as a means of avoiding microbial decarboxylation of free amino acids in the feed and increasing feed intake by improving palatability seems promising but requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17591711     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  30 in total

1.  Targeting gut microbiota and barrier function with prebiotics to alleviate autoimmune manifestations in NOD mice.

Authors:  Camilla H F Hansen; Christian S Larsen; Henriette O Petersson; Line F Zachariassen; Andreas Vegge; Charlotte Lauridsen; Witold Kot; Łukasz Krych; Dennis S Nielsen; Axel K Hansen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Antibiotics modulate intestinal immunity and prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonatal piglets.

Authors:  Michael L Jensen; Thomas Thymann; Malene S Cilieborg; Mikkel Lykke; Lars Mølbak; Bent B Jensen; Mette Schmidt; Denise Kelly; Imke Mulder; Douglas G Burrin; Per T Sangild
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.052

3.  Effect of wet/dry, fresh liquid, fermented whole diet liquid, and fermented cereal liquid feeding on feed microbial quality and growth in grow-finisher pigs.

Authors:  Fiona M O' Meara; Gillian E Gardiner; John V O' Doherty; David Clarke; Wayne Cummins; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Occurrence and identification of yeast species in fermented liquid feed for piglets.

Authors:  Klaus Gori; Marina Kryger Bjørklund; Nuria Canibe; Anni Øyan Pedersen; Lene Jespersen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Bacterial Succession in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Samir Ranjitkar; Blair Lawley; Gerald Tannock; Ricarda M Engberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The Nutritional Value and Physiological Properties of Diets with Raw and Candida utilis-Fermented Lupin Seeds in Rats.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kasprowicz-Potocka; Anita Zaworska; Andrzej Frankiewicz; Włodzimierz Nowak; Piotr Gulewicz; Zenon Zduńczyk; Jerzy Juśkiewicz
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  Nutritive value of corn distiller's dried grains with solubles steeped without or with exogenous feed enzymes for 24 h and fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  Youngji Rho; Elijah Kiarie; Cornelis Kees F M de Lange
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Antibiotic Treatment Affects Intestinal Permeability and Gut Microbial Composition in Wistar Rats Dependent on Antibiotic Class.

Authors:  Monica Vera-Lise Tulstrup; Ellen Gerd Christensen; Vera Carvalho; Caroline Linninge; Siv Ahrné; Ole Højberg; Tine Rask Licht; Martin Iain Bahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Fermented liquid feed for pigs: an ancient technique for the future.

Authors:  Joris Am Missotten; Joris Michiels; Jeroen Degroote; Stefaan De Smet
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-20

Review 10.  Selected Alternative Feed Additives Used to Manipulate the Rumen Microbiome.

Authors:  Marta Michalak; Konrad Wojnarowski; Paulina Cholewińska; Natalia Szeligowska; Marcel Bawej; Jakub Pacoń
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.