Literature DB >> 17590460

Biosecurity measures on swine farms in Spain: perceptions by farmers and their relationship to current on-farm measures.

J Casal1, A De Manuel, E Mateu, M Martín.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted on 172 farms belonging to the same company in order to ascertain the biosecurity measures applied and the importance that farmers attributed to each measure. A questionnaire about general data, the opinions of farmers about biosecurity measures, and a detailed checklist of the biosecurity measures actually applied on the farm was completed for each one of the participating farms. Opinion data were initially analysed by means of a cluster analysis (multidimensional scaling method); then, a logistic regression was used to analyse the relationship between the perceptions of the farmer and the measures applied on the farm. In general, farmers implemented measures to reduce risks of contamination from people and animals other than pigs. In contrast, biosecurity measures related to replacement stock were not applied as often. On average, the farmers scored the biosecurity on their own farms as 6.7 on a scale of 0-10. The most important measures, according to the farmers' perceptions, were the availability of a sanitary ford, a fence around the farm, the restriction of visits and vehicles, using bird-proof nets in windows, having changing facilities, applying quarantines, and the use of other measures related to replacement stock. The perception of a given measure was strongly influenced by the measures actually applied on the farm. Thus, for example, those who did not have a sanitary ford highlighted the importance of disinfecting vehicles while those who had one neglected this type of disinfection. In conclusion, knowledge of the relationships between perceptions and measures taken is important in developing effective biosecurity strategies on pig farms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17590460     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  18 in total

1.  Measuring the costs of biosecurity on poultry farms: a case study in broiler production in Finland.

Authors:  Kirsi-Maarit Siekkinen; Jaakko Heikkilä; Niina Tammiranta; Heidi Rosengren
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.695

2.  Patterns of between-farm contacts via professionals in Sweden.

Authors:  Emelie Olofsson; Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Biosecurity level and health management practices in 60 Swedish farrow-to-finish herds.

Authors:  Annette Backhans; Marie Sjölund; Ann Lindberg; Ulf Emanuelson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  The intention of North-Western Ethiopian dairy farmers to control mastitis.

Authors:  Sefinew Alemu Mekonnen; Gerrit Koop; Theo J G M Lam; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Connecting Different Data Sources to Assess the Interconnections between Biosecurity, Health, Welfare, and Performance in Commercial Pig Farms in Great Britain.

Authors:  Fanny Pandolfi; Sandra A Edwards; Dominiek Maes; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  Surveillance for respiratory and diarrheal pathogens at the human-pig interface in Sarawak, Malaysia.

Authors:  Laura K Borkenhagen; Kerry A Mallinson; Rick W Tsao; Siaw-Jing Ha; Wei-Honn Lim; Teck-Hock Toh; Benjamin D Anderson; Jane K Fieldhouse; Sarah E Philo; Kuek-Sen Chong; William G Lindsley; Alejandro Ramirez; James F Lowe; Kristen K Coleman; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.

Authors:  Karin Kuster; Marie-Eve Cousin; Thomas Jemmi; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The commercial impact of pig Salmonella spp. infections in border-free markets during an economic recession.

Authors:  G Evangelopoulou; S Kritas; G Christodoulopoulos; A R Burriel
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-03-05

10.  Molecular assessment of visitor personal protective equipment contamination with the Aleutian mink disease virus and porcine circovirus-2 in mink and porcine farms.

Authors:  José Manuel Díaz Cao; Alberto Prieto; Gonzalo López; Ricardo Fernández-Antonio; Pablo Díaz; Ceferino López; Susana Remesar; Pablo Díez-Baños; Gonzalo Fernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.