Literature DB >> 17589978

Comparison of stent graft, sirolimus stent, and bare metal stent implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome: clinical and angiographic follow-up.

Maja Strozzi1, Darko Anić.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare polytetrafluoroethylene stent graft (PTFE) with sirolimus and bare metal stents in reducing in-stent restenosis in native coronary vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
METHODS: The study included patients who underwent stent implantation in acute coronary syndrome from January 2003 to May 2004. The patients (n=119) were randomized either to stent graft group (n=40), sirolimus eluting stent group (n=39), or bare metal stent group (n=40). The main outcome measure of the study was the incidence restenosis at 6-month. The secondary outcome was 6-month major adverse coronary event rate.
RESULTS: The incidence of 6-month major adverse coronary events was similar in all three groups (8 events in stent graft, 9 in sirolimus eluting stent, and 16 in bare metal stent group events). The target lesion revascularization was higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.044). Restenosis rate, at six-month follow-up was higher in the bare metal stent group compared with the stent graft and sirolimus eluting stent groups. The percent diameter stenosis in the follow-up was significantly higher in the bare metal stent group (P=0.005). The late loss was significantly lower in the sirolimus eluting stent group (mean+/-standard deviation, 0.2+/-0.5 mm), compared with the bare metal stent group (0.7+/-0.7 mm, P=0.034). There was a trend of lower late loss in the stent graft group than in the bare metal stent group.
CONCLUSION: Three groups of stents implanted in patients with acute coronary syndrome did not differ in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events. Sirolimus-eluting stents had a lower incidence of in-stent restenosis than bare metal stent group. Stent graft implanted in native coronary arteries appears to be safe and efficient in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but a significant reduction in in-stent restenosis was not achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17589978      PMCID: PMC2080548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


  21 in total

1.  Coronary stent grafts covered by a polytetrafluoroethylene membrane.

Authors:  M Elsner; W Auch-Schwelk; M Britten; D H Walter; V Schächinger; A M Zeiher
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Christian Spaulding; Patrick Henry; Emmanuel Teiger; Kevin Beatt; Ezio Bramucci; Didier Carrié; Michel S Slama; Bela Merkely; Andrejs Erglis; Massimo Margheri; Olivier Varenne; Ana Cebrian; Hans-Peter Stoll; David B Snead; Christoph Bode
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Treatment of a coronary aneurysm involving bifurcation with the use of a custom-made polytetrafluoroethylene-covered bifurcation stent system.

Authors:  Ioannis Iakovou; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Covered stents: no class I A indication but "thank God they still exist!".

Authors:  Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  The role of covered stents: more than an occasional cameo?

Authors:  M C Petrie; J O J Peels; G Jessurun
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Patency and tissue response related to two types of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents in the dog.

Authors:  B L Dolmatch; F O Tio; X D Li; Y H Dong
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Covered versus bare self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis: a stopped randomized trial.

Authors:  Martin Schillinger; Petra Dick; Gerald Wiest; Stephan Gentzsch; Schila Sabeti; Markus Haumer; Andrea Willfort; Christian Nasel; Christian Wöber; Josef Zeitlhofer; Erich Minar
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a clinical and angiographic study.

Authors:  Francesco Saia; Pedro A Lemos; Chi-Hang Lee; Chourmouzios A Arampatzis; Angela Hoye; Muzaffer Degertekin; Kengo Tanabe; Georgios Sianos; Pieter C Smits; Eugene McFadden; Sjoerd H Hofma; Willem J van der Giessen; Pim J de Feyter; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Randomized evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent in saphenous vein grafts: the Randomized Evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene COVERed stent in Saphenous vein grafts (RECOVERS) Trial.

Authors:  Goran Stankovic; Antonio Colombo; Patrizia Presbitero; Frank van den Branden; Luigi Inglese; Carmelo Cernigliaro; Luigi Niccoli; Antonio L Bartorelli; Paolo Rubartelli; Nicholaus Reifart; Guy R Heyndrickx; Kari Saunamäki; Marie Claude Morice; Fabio A Sgura; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Janette Greenhalgh; Juliet Hounsome; Naqash J Sethi; Sanam Safi; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.