Literature DB >> 17588794

A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children.

Mesut Erdurmus1, Ramazan Yagci, Remzi Karadag, Mustafa Durmus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the results of photorefraction measurement obtained with a Plusoptix CR03 to those of cycloplegic retinoscopy as a standard refraction method in children.
METHODS: We assessed the refractive status of 204 eyes in 204 healthy children. The values acquired via photorefraction (noncycloplegic refraction) with a Plusoptix CR03 device were compared with those obtained via cycloplegic retinoscopy. Both methods were used in the same eyes and in all children. The paired tt-test and Pearson's correlation analysis were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean age was 7.1 +/- 2.4 years (range, 9 months to 14 years). The average spherical refractive error was +0.05 +/- 0.65 D for photorefraction versus +0.75 +/- 0.77 D for cycloplegic retinoscopy (average difference, -0.70 D; p < 0.001), with moderate correlation between measures (r = 0.63). The average cylinder power was +0.43 +/- 0.38 D for photorefraction versus +0.29 +/- 0.38 D for cycloplegic retinoscopy (average difference, +0.14 D; p < 0.001), with moderate correlation between measures (r = 0.70). The average spherical equivalent was +0.26 +/- 0.63 D for photorefraction versus +0.90 +/- 0.76 D for cycloplegic retinoscopy (average difference, -0.64 D; p < 0.001), with moderate correlation between measures (r = 0.63).
CONCLUSIONS: The Plusoptix CR03 device tends toward minus overcorrection in children, resulting in overdiagnosis of myopia. Studies of a population of subjects with a larger range of ametropia will be required to validate this instrument as a screening tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17588794     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of non-cycloplegic photorefraction, cycloplegic photorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Ozdemir Ozdemir; Zuhal Özen Tunay; Ikbal Seza Petriçli; Damla Ergintürk Acar; Muhammet Kazım Erol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of photorefraction, autorefractometry and retinoscopy in children.

Authors:  Goktug Demirci; Banu Arslan; Mustafa Özsütçü; Mustafa Eliaçık; Gokhan Gulkilik
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Detection of Significant Hyperopia in Preschool Children Using Two Automated Vision Screeners.

Authors:  Maureen G Maguire; Gui-Shuang Ying; Elise B Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; T Rowan Candy; Bruce Moore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Refractive status and prevalence of refractive errors in suburban school-age children.

Authors:  Lian-Hong Pi; Lin Chen; Qin Liu; Ning Ke; Jing Fang; Shu Zhang; Jun Xiao; Wei-Jiang Ye; Yan Xiong; Hui Shi; Zheng-Qin Yin
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  The use of cues to convergence and accommodation in naïve, uninstructed participants.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?

Authors:  Zhale Rajavi; Hiva Parsafar; Alireza Ramezani; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-01

8.  Photorefraction estimates of refractive power varies with the ethnic origin of human eyes.

Authors:  N Geetha Sravani; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.

Authors:  Xiao-Ran Yan; Wan-Zhen Jiao; Zhi-Wei Li; Wen-Wen Xu; Feng-Jiao Li; Li-Hua Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Irene Sanchez; Sara Ortiz-Toquero; Raul Martin; Victoria de Juan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.