Literature DB >> 17587611

The influence of aging on the prognostic value of the revised cardiac risk index for postoperative cardiac complications in vascular surgery patients.

G M J M Welten1, O Schouten, R T van Domburg, H H H Feringa, S E Hoeks, M Dunkelgrün, Y R B M van Gestel, D Goei, J J Bax, D Poldermans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Lee-risk index [Lee-index] was developed to predict major adverse cardiac events [MACE]. However, age is not included as a risk factor. The aim was to assess the value of the Lee-index in vascular surgery patients among different age categories.
METHODS: Of 2642 patients cardiovascular risk factors were noted to calculate the Lee-index. Patients were divided into four age categories; < or = 55 (n=396), 56-65 (n=650), 66-75 (n=1058) and > 75 years (n=538). Outcome measures were postoperative MACE (cardiac death, MI, coronary revascularization and heart failure). The performance of the Lee-index was determined using C-statistics within the four age groups.
RESULTS: The incidence of MACE was 10.9%, for Lee-index 1, 2 and > or = 3; 6%, 13% and 20%, respectively. However, the prognostic value differed among age groups. The predictive value for MACE was highest among patients under 55 year (0.76 vs 0.62 of patients aged > 75). The prediction of MACE improved in elderly (aged > 75) after adjusting the Lee-index with age, revised risk of operation (low, low-intermediate, high-intermediate and high-risk procedures) and hypertension (0.62 to 0.69).
CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of the Lee-index is reduced in elderly vascular surgery patients, adjustment with age, risk of surgical procedure, and hypertension improves the Lee-index significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17587611     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

1.  Intra-Operative Fluid Management in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: Randomised Control Trial Comparing Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP).

Authors:  Shalini Cynthia Sundaram; Serina Ruth Salins; Amar Nandha Kumar; Grace Korula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

Review 2.  Cardiac evaluation of liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Mercedes Susan Mandell; Joann Lindenfeld; Mei-Yung Tsou; Michael Zimmerman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for abdominal aortic aneurysms surgery in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Issam Abouliatim; Andreas Paramythiotis; Majid Harmouche; Elisabeth Ternisien; Jean-Philippe Verhoye
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-28

Review 4.  The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Lisette M Vernooij; Wilton A van Klei; Karel Gm Moons; Toshihiko Takada; Judith van Waes; Johanna Aag Damen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  The Vascular Quality Initiative Cardiac Risk Index for prediction of myocardial infarction after vascular surgery.

Authors:  Daniel J Bertges; Dan Neal; Andres Schanzer; Salvatore T Scali; Philip P Goodney; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Cardiac risk factors of revascularization in chronic atherosclerotic lower extremity ischemia.

Authors:  Tae-Yoon Kim; Woo-Sung Yun; Kihyuk Park
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-02-27

7.  Validation of a model to predict all-cause in-hospital mortality in vascular surgical patients.

Authors:  B M Biccard; R R Pooran
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.