Literature DB >> 17587062

Does the badge of status influence parental care and investment in house sparrows? An experimental test.

Shinichi Nakagawa1, Nancy Ockendon, Duncan O S Gillespie, Ben J Hatchwell, Terry Burke.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that traits which signal parental quality might evolve in males of species with biparental care. In avian species, male ornaments may be the most likely candidates for such signals. Male house sparrows (Passer domesticus) possess a black throat patch often referred to as a "badge" or a "badge of status". By assuming a trade-off between male attractiveness (reflected in male ornaments) and parental care under the differential allocation hypothesis, we predicted that badge size would be negatively correlated with male parental investment. An experiment in which the badge was enlarged in one group and unchanged in a control group was conducted. Our manipulation was predicted to affect female as well as male parental investment. However, we found that eight variables associated with parental investment-the start date for breeding, clutch size, male and female incubation time, male and female food provisioning rate, and average chick weight and the number of fledglings-barely differed between treatments. Also, little evidence for correlations between natural variation in badge size and any of these eight variables was found. Instead, the start date for breeding and the number of fledglings were significantly correlated with both male and female age, while clutch size increased with female age. Female condition was a positive predictor of clutch size and number of fledglings. Female tarsus length, unexpectedly, is related to both male and female incubation time. Badge size was also positively correlated with male age. However, parental age (male or female) was not related to parental care. We conclude that badge size does not signal parental quality, but that the ages of both sexes and the condition of the female play significant roles in the reproductive performance of this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17587062     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0765-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games.

Authors:  J M McNamara; C E Gasson; A I Houston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Seasonal changes in androgen receptor immunoreactivity in the song nucleus HVc of a wild bird.

Authors:  K K Soma; V N Hartman; J C Wingfield; E A Brenowitz
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-06-28       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Conflict between parents over care.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; Tamás Székely; John M McNamara
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Female moorhens compete for small fat males.

Authors:  M Petrie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Should females prefer dominant males?

Authors:  A Qvarnström; E Forsgren
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  THE SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AVIAN WINTER PLUMAGE VARIABILITY.

Authors:  Sievert Rohwer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  SEXUAL SELECTION BY THE HANDICAP MECHANISM.

Authors:  John S Heywood
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  BADGE SIZE, PHENOTYPIC QUALITY, AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN THE HOUSE SPARROW: A STUDY ON HONEST ADVERTISEMENT.

Authors:  José P Veiga
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow (Passer domesticus).

Authors:  H Jensen; B E Saether; T H Ringsby; J Tufto; S C Griffith; H Ellegren
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.411

View more
  8 in total

1.  Direct benefits of mate choice: a meta-analysis of plumage colour and offspring feeding rates in birds.

Authors:  Gergely Hegyi; Dóra Kötél; Miklós Laczi
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-09-18

2.  Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation.

Authors:  W Edwin Harris; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Non-breeding feather concentrations of testosterone, corticosterone and cortisol are associated with subsequent survival in wild house sparrows.

Authors:  Lee Koren; Shinichi Nakagawa; Terry Burke; Kiran K Soma; Katherine E Wynne-Edwards; Eli Geffen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  What is the best fitness measure in wild populations? A case study on the power of short-term fitness proxies to predict reproductive value.

Authors:  Živa Alif; Jamie Dunning; Heung Ying Janet Chik; Terry Burke; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Evidence of Paternal Effects on Telomere Length Increases in Early Life.

Authors:  Sophie Bennett; Antje Girndt; Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar; Terry Burke; Mirre Simons; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Only females in poor condition display a clear preference and prefer males with an average badge.

Authors:  Matteo Griggio; Herbert Hoi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Differential selection according to the degree of cheating in a status signal.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Jin-Won Lee; Beth K Woodward; Ben J Hatchwell; Terry Burke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Costly infidelity: low lifetime fitness of extra-pair offspring in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Yu-Hsun Hsu; Julia Schroeder; Isabel Winney; Terry Burke; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.