BACKGROUND: An international working group convened by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) called for a reference measurement procedure for use in a trueness-based standardization project of insulin immunoassays. In view of this demand, we conducted a pilot study to investigate the feasibility of such a standardization project with our isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC/tandem MS) procedure. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, accuracy, and limit of quantification (LoQ) of the ID-LC/tandem MS procedure by use of insulin-free serum supplemented with insulin to give 3 pools with concentrations of 0.0796, 0.769, and 5.56 microg/L. We conducted a pilot method comparison study with 4 immunoassays and 80 samples from fasting and glucose-stimulated patients. RESULTS: The within-run and total imprecision (CV) ranged from 3.2% to 6.3% and from 4.9% to 12.1% (listing sequence from the high to the low pool). The recovery from supplemented insulin-free sera ranged from 101.8% to 104.1%, and the LoQ was 0.07 microg/L (12 pmol/L). Weighted Deming regression and correlation analysis of the method-comparison data showed considerable between-assay variation for the immunoassays but, with the exception of one assay, excellent correlation with ID-LC/tandem MS. Recalibration of the immunoassay results considerably reduced the between-assay variation. Moreover, after recalibration, 3 of the 4 assays fulfilled the total error specification of 32% proposed by the ADA Workgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Recalibration of insulin assays by regression equations established from method comparison with ID-LC/tandem MS can result in successful standardization and fulfillment of the total error criterion proposed by the ADA Workgroup.
BACKGROUND: An international working group convened by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) called for a reference measurement procedure for use in a trueness-based standardization project of insulin immunoassays. In view of this demand, we conducted a pilot study to investigate the feasibility of such a standardization project with our isotope dilution-liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC/tandem MS) procedure. METHODS: We evaluated the precision, accuracy, and limit of quantification (LoQ) of the ID-LC/tandem MS procedure by use of insulin-free serum supplemented with insulin to give 3 pools with concentrations of 0.0796, 0.769, and 5.56 microg/L. We conducted a pilot method comparison study with 4 immunoassays and 80 samples from fasting and glucose-stimulated patients. RESULTS: The within-run and total imprecision (CV) ranged from 3.2% to 6.3% and from 4.9% to 12.1% (listing sequence from the high to the low pool). The recovery from supplemented insulin-free sera ranged from 101.8% to 104.1%, and the LoQ was 0.07 microg/L (12 pmol/L). Weighted Deming regression and correlation analysis of the method-comparison data showed considerable between-assay variation for the immunoassays but, with the exception of one assay, excellent correlation with ID-LC/tandem MS. Recalibration of the immunoassay results considerably reduced the between-assay variation. Moreover, after recalibration, 3 of the 4 assays fulfilled the total error specification of 32% proposed by the ADA Workgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Recalibration of insulin assays by regression equations established from method comparison with ID-LC/tandem MS can result in successful standardization and fulfillment of the total error criterion proposed by the ADA Workgroup.
Authors: Jeff Cobb; Walter Gall; Klaus-Peter Adam; Pamela Nakhle; Eric Button; James Hathorn; Kay Lawton; Michael Milburn; Regis Perichon; Matthew Mitchell; Andrea Natali; Ele Ferrannini Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2013-01-01
Authors: Myrlene A Staten; Michael P Stern; W Greg Miller; Michael W Steffes; Scott E Campbell Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Susan E Manley; Stephen D Luzio; Irene M Stratton; Tara M Wallace; Penelope M S Clark Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 19.112