Literature DB >> 17586154

Biocompatibility of dental materials.

Kenneth R St John1.   

Abstract

With the long history of use of many materials in dental surgery, biocompatibility concerns are not as great a concern as other issues, such as long-term degradation, mechanical strength problems, and prevention of secondary caries. It is important, however, not to forget that the potential exists for adverse tissue responses to synthetic materials used in repair, augmentation, and repair of natural tissue structures. As new materials and repair techniques become available and the sophistication of cell-level and subcellular response evaluations increases, the concerns to be addressed and the methods to be used may change. The advent of tissue-engineered medical products may mean that new questions must be addressed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17586154     DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Clin North Am        ISSN: 0011-8532


  9 in total

1.  Surface treatment of dental porcelain: CO2 laser as an alternative to oven glaze.

Authors:  Ricardo Sgura; Mariana Cavalcante Reis; Antonio Carlos Hernandes; Márcia Carvalho de Abreu Fantini; Marcello Rubens Barsi Andreeta; Igor Studart Medeiros
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Dentin on the nanoscale: Hierarchical organization, mechanical behavior and bioinspired engineering.

Authors:  Luiz E Bertassoni
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Histopathologic study of rat connective tissue responses to maxillofacial silicone elastomers.

Authors:  Bilge Turhan Bal; Handan Yilmaz; Cemal Aydin; Seçil Karakoca; Benay Tokman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to resin composites polymerized with different light curing units and different lightening methods.

Authors:  Atiyeh Feiz; Farahnaz Arbabzadeh Zavareh; Seyed Mohammad Razavi; Hamid Badrian; Sepideh Dolatyar; Mansoureh Vajihi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-14

5.  Efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: study protocol for the CECOIA randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hélène Fron Chabouis; Caroline Prot; Cyrille Fonteneau; Karim Nasr; Olivier Chabreron; Stéphane Cazier; Christian Moussally; Alexandre Gaucher; Inès Khabthani Ben Jaballah; Renaud Boyer; Jean-François Leforestier; Aurore Caumont-Prim; Florence Chemla; Louis Maman; Cathy Nabet; Jean-Pierre Attal
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Comparison of the osteogenic potential of titanium- and modified zirconia-based bioceramics.

Authors:  Young-Dan Cho; Ji-Cheol Shin; Hye-Lee Kim; Myagmar Gerelmaa; Hyung-In Yoon; Hyun-Mo Ryoo; Dae-Joon Kim; Jung-Suk Han
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of porcelain to a beryllium-free alloy of nickel-chromium, nickel and beryllium free alloy of cobalt-chromium, and titanium: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ananya Singh; Keerthi Ramachandra; Achut R Devarhubli
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Oxidative Stress Evaluation in Patients Treated with Orthodontic Self-ligating Multibracket Appliances: An in Vivo Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Marco Portelli; Angela Militi; Gabriele Cervino; Floriana Lauritano; Sergio Sambataro; Alberto Mainardi; Riccardo Nucera
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-06-30

9.  Histocompatibility of Dental Restorative Composite Resin Photopolymerized with a Novel Multifunctional Comonomer: A Histopathological Analysis in Rats.

Authors:  Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar; Ranganathan Ajay; Karuppiah Gokulapriyan; Natesan Thangaraj Deepa; Subramaniam Kalaiyarasu Vigneshwari; Shafie Ahamed
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.