Literature DB >> 17585179

Measurements of wrist and finger postures: a comparison of goniometric and motion capture techniques.

James R Cook1, Nancy A Baker, Rakie Cham, Erin Hale, Mark S Redfern.   

Abstract

A marker-based kinematic hand model to quantify finger postures was developed and compared to manual goniometric measurements. The model was implemented with data collected from static postures of five subjects. The metacarpal phalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were positioned in flexion of approximately 30, 60, and 90 degrees for 5 subjects. Wrist flexion/extension and ulnar/radial deviations were also examined. The model-based angles for the MCP and PIP joints were not statistically equivalent to the goniometric measurements, with differences of -1.8 degrees and +3.5 degrees, respectively. Differences between the two measurement methods for the MCP and PIP were found to be a function of the posture (i.e., 150, 120, or 90 degree blocks) used. Wrist measurements differed by -4.0 degrees for ulnar/radial deviation and +5.2 degrees for flexion/extension. Much of the difference between the model and goniometric measurements is believed due to inaccuracies in the goniometric measurements. The proposed model is useful for future investigations of finger-intensive activities by supplying accurate and unbiased measures of joint angles.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17585179     DOI: 10.1123/jab.23.1.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomech        ISSN: 1065-8483            Impact factor:   1.833


  13 in total

1.  Viability of Hand and Wrist Photogoniometry.

Authors:  Clifton G Meals; Rebecca J Saunders; Sameer Desale; Kenneth R Means
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-04-09

2.  Reliability and validity of the delta finger-to-palm (FTP), a new measure of finger range of motion in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Kathryn S Torok; Nancy A Baker; Mary Lucas; Robyn T Domsic; Robert Boudreau; Thomas A Medsger
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  Is diagrammatic goniometry feasible for finger ROM evaluation and self-evaluation?

Authors:  Valdas Macionis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Metacarpal Arc Motion: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods.

Authors:  Carina Büren; Abdullah Al Maktary; Joachim Windolf; Sebastian V Gehrmann
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2020-08-13

5.  Identification of three movement phases of the hand during lateral and pulp pinches using video motion capture.

Authors:  Johanna Jahn; William E Janes; Maryam Saheb-Al-Zamani; Caitlin M Burbank; Justin M Brown; Jack R Engsberg
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Application of national testing standards to simulation-based assessments of clinical palpation skills.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Improving Kinematic Accuracy of Soft Wearable Data Gloves by Optimizing Sensor Locations.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Kim; Sang Wook Lee; Hyung-Soon Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A Soft Sensor-Based Three-Dimensional (3-D) Finger Motion Measurement System.

Authors:  Wookeun Park; Kyongkwan Ro; Suin Kim; Joonbum Bae
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Reissner; Gabriella Fischer; Renate List; William R Taylor; Pietro Giovanoli; Maurizio Calcagni
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Reliability of the standard goniometry and diagrammatic recording of finger joint angles: a comparative study with healthy subjects and non-professional raters.

Authors:  Valdas Macionis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.