Literature DB >> 17583992

Neural mechanisms of the time-order error: an MEG study.

Ilana S Hairston1, Srikantan S Nagarajan.   

Abstract

The time-order error (TOE) refers to the influence of presentation order on performance accuracy in a discrimination task. Despite it being a well-documented perceptual bias, the underlying mechanisms have not been studied. In this study, observers were trained on a two-interval forced-choice procedure. The stimuli presented for discrimination were a standard, consisting of four tones presented at a 5-Hz rate, and targets, consisting of various rates higher than 5 Hz. Psychometric functions were measured for discrimination of the trained standard and targets, a novel standard of 13 Hz with higher target rates; and the trained 5 Hz standard with novel targets with rates below 5 Hz. Discrimination did not improve with training; in fact, accuracy declined when standard was presented in the first interval during the session, resulting in a TOE. The TOE was specific to the 5-Hz standard generalizing to the novel targets slower than 5 Hz, but not to the 13-Hz STANDARD. Analysis of the event-related magnetic field responses (ERFs) revealed a waveform to the whole stimulus, rather than to each tone in the train. Although ERFs in the second interval were attenuated independent of stimulus type, the M300 component in the second interval was attenuated only when the standard was first, but remained of equivalent magnitude when the standard was second. This was observed only in the two 5-Hz conditions. Combined, these results suggest that the TOE reflects the emergence of an internal representation of the standard, and that the M300 is potentially a neural correlate of plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17583992     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Luba Daikhin; Yedida Lubin; Yamit Cohen; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dimension-specific attention directs learning and listening on auditory training tasks.

Authors:  Lorna F Halliday; David R Moore; Jenny L Taylor; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Prior and present evidence: how prior experience interacts with present information in a perceptual decision making task.

Authors:  Muhsin Karim; Justin A Harris; John W Morley; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The influence of prior experience and expected timing on vibrotactile discrimination.

Authors:  Muhsin Karim; Justin A Harris; Angela Langdon; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Contradictory behavioral biases result from the influence of past stimuli on perception.

Authors:  Ofri Raviv; Itay Lieder; Yonatan Loewenstein; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Perceptual inequality between two neighboring time intervals defined by sound markers: correspondence between neurophysiological and psychological data.

Authors:  Takako Mitsudo; Yoshitaka Nakajima; Hiroshige Takeichi; Shozo Tobimatsu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-23

7.  Human substantia nigra neurons encode decision outcome and are modulated by categorization uncertainty in an auditory categorization task.

Authors:  Robert A McGovern; Andrew K Chan; Charles B Mikell; John P Sheehy; Vincent P Ferrera; Guy M McKhann
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-09

8.  A Computational Model of Implicit Memory Captures Dyslexics' Perceptual Deficits.

Authors:  Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Ofri Raviv; Nori Jacoby; Yonatan Loewenstein; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.